• NeptuneOrbit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    105
    ·
    13 days ago

    If we take out 7k of the gross $46,0000/yr for healthcare and retirement…

    $5,700 for federal taxes, another k for state taxes…

    That’s about $2692 a month, net. Subtract the just over $2k a month listed, there’s another $400 a month for… Utilities, phone, transportation, entertainment, savings, emergencies.

    Even as rent is under 25% of income, pretty tight. Doable. But very tighter. You will never retire saving $4000 a year. You can never get sick. You apparently walk to work.

    Pretty much have to get a roommate until the student loans are paid off.

      • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        It’s designed to prevent savings and use as much of your income for trickle up economics as possible before your max out your borrowing potential or get sick and die.

  • brygphilomena@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    12 days ago

    Talk with the student loan provider. Get on income based repayment plans, you end up paying more in the long run, but less each month (or none at all) so you can at least eat.

      • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        12 days ago

        This was nearly 20 years ago, but when I dropped out (two years in college, so don’t even have a degree), it was all spread across 4 loans (something weird, I dunno, I was a kid, but it was like a new loan for each semester? That didn’t even count the parent loans my mom took out for my schooling - thank god they just wrote those off entirely when she died). The repayment ticket book I received was $55 per week for each loan. That was $880 a month they wanted. For about a total of $50k of debt. With the sharp increase in tuition costs since I was in school, I wouldn’t be surprised if $1000 total per month is on the low end if you just pay what they ask you to. They don’t really tell you that you are taking out multiple loans by going to school, not just one big one.

        I did as the above comment said and got on an IDR (Income Driven Repayment) plan, it basically refinanced my 4 loans into 1 and my monthly bill was now $57 a month, and it adjusts each year around tax time based on the previous year’s income. I’m currently paying about $80 a month.

        • theo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          12 days ago

          That sounds like it sucks, especially to take on when you still don’t know what you are doing in life. I am glad you have since sorted it to be lower.

          Do you get the same situation over there where interest increases the size of the loan more than you can pay it off with the lower amount now? In the UK most students expect to never pay theirs of before it gets cancelled around retirement age.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            12 days ago

            Yeah, I don’t know about their loan specifically but that’s a situation that happens here too.

            We’ve killed the retirement industry and it just hasn’t hit yet.

          • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 days ago

            Uhhh… In theory, if you are on one of the IDR plans, it is supposed to work that anything you have not paid off after 10 years gets “forgiven”… But I don’t even know if these plans existed 10 years ago, I think the one I am on was an Obama era program. I know there are a lot of government programs that are supposed to “forgive” some amount of the loan, or the entire loan, after a certain amount of time for people working in certain sectors (like teachers or other civil servants) that just aren’t actually working. I didn’t get on the program right away (I just let them ruin my credit for a decade…), so I’m not 10 years in yet (also because everything was on “pause” during covid from mid 2020 until late 2023, so those 3 years didn’t count toward the 10).

            There have been news stories of people whose loans were supposed to be forgiven under one of those “civil servant” programs (because apparently we know they are horribly under-paid but instead of fixing that, we just made a program to forgive their massive student debt?) that just didn’t. The departments that handle the forgiveness play the “we are short staffed and too backed up, we will get to you eventually” card and they keep receiving bills every month, or they say their records don’t agree that they qualify anymore (blah blah whoopsy poopsy, you know how bad the gov’t is at keeping records, right?). And since the plans are usually dependent on not missing payments, you have to keep paying or risk losing the status needed for the forgiveness in the first place and/or they absolutely won’t forget to ruin your credit and fast.

            It is a fucking nightmare all around to be honest. But at least it isn’t constantly ruining my credit anymore and I can afford to pay what they want each month without giving up on food or rent.

      • NotLost@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        12 days ago

        That’s much higher than normal. A quick google suggests between $200-$500 is more in line with a normal student loan monthly payment, which is still a burden on someone just starting out.

        • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          12 days ago

          Only speaking from my own experience, but that sounds in-line with what the monthly payment is for each loan, but when I came out I had 4 separate loans that they came collecting on.

          • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            12 days ago

            The IBR plans are aggregated against all your federal loans. So, unless there are some weird private loans in there, that’s the upper limit in sum total based on the income we’re discussing here.

            • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              12 days ago

              They aren’t on an income based repayment currently (or there is no evidence stating they are or aren’t I guess), so he would be dealing with all the separate loans sending him bills currently. Definitely needs to get on one though, it would help a lot, more than likely.

      • Daze@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        12 days ago

        If you have any hope at all of keeping the interest from ballooning the principal beyond the original loan amount, yes.

        :(

        • Zron@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          12 days ago

          Or do what my cousin did.

          Have uncle take out loan entirely under his name.

          Make minimum payment on it.

          When he dies, the debt dies with him.

          • KevonLooney
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            12 days ago

            How are they taking out education loans in someone else’s name? Sounds like fraud.

            • SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              12 days ago

              In the United States, there’s a federal loan option called Parent Plus loans that can allow parents to take out loans for their children’s education. Private loans could be taken out by just about anyone to pay for a student’s education, depending on the institution.

            • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              12 days ago

              Parent loans are a thing. The parent of the kid takes out the loan, not the kid themselves. And yes, thankfully, they just go away if the parent dies and don’t get passed on to the estate.

      • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        edit Didn’t mean to double post the same comment - internet at work sucks :(

      • doingthestuff@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 days ago

        My daughter went to one fucking semester and is paying $900/mo for two years. We tried to talk her out of it but she wouldn’t hear reason. She’s going to go back to school a little wiser next year.

    • shasta
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      I got through college with no loans. But I had a scholarship for a few years that paid 75% tuition. I ended up taking 7 years to graduate because when the scholarship ran out, I cut back on my class load to work full time as a bookkeeper to pay for my living expenses and tuition. I could’ve done a lot better if I had gone to a community college for at least the first two years but I got duped by university “prestige”. Being in the workforce now, I know employers don’t care what school you attended.

    • MeDuViNoX@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      You can get one a lot cheaper than that, but you’re going to have to move somewhere you probably don’t want to live.

        • MeDuViNoX@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 days ago

          It kinda depends where you live, the cheaper apartments here are the same distance to work, just on a different side of town.

          It’s still not worth the grief to live there, for me personally.

      • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        I live near one of the worst Philadelphia suburbs to live in (Chester) and even there you’re not going to find a one bedroom apartment for $850. You might find a room in a house for that little. On the flip side, I own a small two bedroom house in a very nice suburb that I rent out for $1400 a month. If you can find at least one other human being that you can cohabitate with peacefully, you can do a lot better than trying to find your own place. Easier said than done, I know - I hate living with other people.

        • doingthestuff@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 days ago

          Yeah before I got married I had housemates. It sucks but our rent was $750/month for a disgusting 2BR in a bad neighborhood 30 years ago when I was making $6/hr. That’s why I moved out of California.

    • uis
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      12 days ago

      In Russia we have plenty of single bedroom(they are just called single room) apartments for rent much less than 850. Even in Moscow.

      Also don’t be worse than Russia. Please fix.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        11 days ago

        The old USSR did an excellent job of surveying the future population demands and building housing accordingly. This was called Central Planning and Americans scoffed at it as a thing that couldn’t work, because it didn’t immediately and immensely enrich the landed class.

        Then the USSR collapsed, the Russian economy went into a nose dive, and Russia experienced an enormous population contraction as mortality rates and emigration surged. Suddenly, they had more housing stock than they knew what to do with, and even the newly implemented property class couldn’t squeeze people on the scale of your average Trumpy New York / LA / Dallas landleech. So now you’re still wildly overpaying what you’d have spent on housing thirty years ago, and the conditions have only deteriorated since. But you’re still somehow better off than some poor sap living in a Detroit slum or a San Fransisco closet or a Miami favela, paying twice as much.

        These conditions aren’t going to last in Russia. But as Putin pivots back to a more command oriented economy (trading out old school soviet internationalism for new school national socialism) it does appear they’re positioned to avoid the American Techbro system of “Everyone must live in the pod and eat the bugs” that we’re currently headed towards.

        • uis
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          11 days ago

          The old USSR did an excellent job of surveying the future population demands and building housing accordingly.

          Indeed. What USSR did really well is housing, healthcare and education. And looked into future. “We need to build school here because 30 years later current kids will have X kids that need to go to school”. Not that it didn’t have own downsides.

          These conditions aren’t going to last in Russia.

          I have to agree here for now. Degradation of education system is glaringly obvious. Healthcare in regions too. Housing… slowly deteriorates.

          But as Putin pivots back to a more command oriented economy

          Except Putin’s command economy will exist only to build more yachts for him and his oligarchs.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 days ago

            Not that it didn’t have own downsides.

            Not unreasonably, people in these very structured economies would balk when they felt they were on rails heading into a profession or career that lacked prestige or a high quality of living. Everyone wants to be the company boss, nobody wants to be the guy working the line.

            Except Putin’s command economy will exist only to build more yachts for him and his oligarchs.

            Hardly. One of the critical impacts of sanctions on the Russian economy have been a deficit of luxury goods. But they’ve got tons of legacy capital from back when they used to make shit and export it to their allies abroad. Russian commercial airlines may become a thing again. Russian automobiles already are. And there’s quite a bit downstream in the economy that’s very lucrative to produce without needing to be larcenous.

            The string of wars Putin’s getting his country into makes these kind of industrial centers vital. He doesn’t have the luxury of building yachts.

  • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    I’m realistically in the situation OP is trying to get at. I’m making over $30/hr, I’ve been in my career a few years. I pay $1500 towards my housing expenses each month (rent/mortgage, electricity, heat, etc). I pay something like $500 in insurance between my vehicle and home, probably a bit less… My debt repayments are well over $1000/month. I pay $100 each for my cellphone and internet…

    I have a slew of other expenses I can’t really enumerate. When I factor in food and gasoline, etc, I basically have no money left. I might have $200 left each month if I’m very thrifty with food.

    You know what I’m doing? I’m in the process of getting my finances into a system that can help me visualize the spending and plan for my month over month budgeting. I’m trying to find where I can find costs I don’t need, and cut costs where I can. My work requires me to have a car, and while my vehicle is older, it works great and is pretty good on gas; best of all, I’ve paid off my car. I’m trying to dig myself out of this situation I’m in, and get in the black eventually. I’m tired of worrying about debt, which I’ve been in for nearly 20 years, in some way, shape or form.

      • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        Solid suggestion. I’m trying to get up and running with something a bit more involved. Right now I’m standing up a firefly III system for myself; I have to stand up an add-on to import data. Still gotta figure out some particulars.

        It’s self hosted FOSS, which bluntly, I trust more than anything else. I’m certainly not paying what some companies think their budgeting software is worth on a subscription just to do my personal finance.

        EDIT: just to be clear, I’m not knocking the price of ynab here, I’m more specifically talking about something like quicken, which is between $2-5 monthly to subscribe (depending on which product you get). IMO, it’s pretty idiotic to pay monthly to manage your monthly finances. I would imagine most people would use quicken (or a similar app) to reduce their month by month spending on stuff, and the first thing you need to do to get started is to spend more money monthly to have the privilege of doing so. There are obviously benefits and value to doing that, but it doesn’t make sense for me.

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 days ago

      If you don’t need a ton of data, Mint mobile has a $15 a month 5 GB per month plan. It costs me $201.51 per year. I have to pay a year at a time, but that helped me cut my phone costs by a ton

          • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 days ago

            I don’t hold you, or any Americans, personally responsible. I understand that there’s a certain culture in your country… Not the primary culture, there’s a mash of a few different cultures, but one specifically (you know which one), that’s particularly problematic.

            That culture has infected us for seemingly no good reason whatsoever. A lot of the issues that are central to that culture are not even discussed in our political circles because they’re issues we’ve basically decided on already, that, with any luck at all, will not be changing.

            Those up here that have tried to stir the pot have so far, gotten nowhere.

            The most significant impact that I’ve directly been aware of from American politics was the mask protests. The idiot bridge that decided to have a demonstration at the capital during COVID, ironically leading to several of them getting COVID in the process…

            It’s not just the anti mask protests I’m taking about, it’s the group that would have a protest about mask mandates. IMO, they’re the most direct and significant problem to be inherited from our neighbors to the south, and bluntly, I don’t consider them a representation of the nation as a whole. For the most part, like Canada, you’re all just regular people living your lives trying to make it by. Not deranged activists trying to prove a point that everyone understands and thinks you’re an idiot for dying on that hill… Oh we know what their point is, we just don’t care, nor agree with it.

            I’m sure most of our neighbors to the south are just trying to get by without struggling too much.

            I’m certain you’re mostly all fine folk just trying to live.

      • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        Just about. I have pretty comprehensive insurance on my car, plus content and property insurance for my home.

        All average between $100-$200 each, so $500 is a reasonable estimate.

        • Geth@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 days ago

          That is crazy to me. I pay something like 500€/year for house insurance including contents and about 400€/year for the car. So that’s about 75€/month. But I’m in a different country so who knows. Your other expenses weren’t that different to mine, though.

          • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 days ago

            I’m in Canada so our dollar is worth less than American dollars and I believe euros are with more than USD, works out to 330 euro or something.

            Our rates are clearly higher still. But hopefully that puts things into a better context.

            I’m around $35 CAD for my wage per hour, which is still pretty low IMO.

            Inflation has hit us really hard…

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    The system has made it impossible to live alone. You pretty much have to pair up with someone and split finances, whether that’s a romantic partner or a roommate or whatever. You have to be absolutely killing it to be younger than 40 and living alone right now.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      American Capitalists: “Communism doesn’t work.”

      Also, American Capitalists: “Live in a large shared space, cook meals together, and maybe even do a little farming on the side to supplement your diet. Also, don’t use the traditional professional trade system. Learn by doing! Become your own mechanic, have friends cut your own hair and do your own dentistry, home school your kids, and dig your own well for water. Basically, become a 1950s Maoist.”

  • Armok: God of Blood@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    If anon is in the US, they can switch to a SAVE plan which would make their monthly payments zero and get the loan discharged after 20-25 years. It’s not much, but it’s something.

    • Obi@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 days ago

      Can you explain a bit more for us non-americans? You pay 0 and after 25 years it’s written off? Why doesn’t everybody do that then?

      • Armok: God of Blood@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        You pay a percentage of your income, but 225% of the federal poverty guideline is subtracted from your income before the calculation is made. If you haven’t paid off the loan within a certain timeframe (I believe 10 years if you have $12,000 in loans or less, 20 years if it’s more but you didn’t go to grad school, or 25 years otherwise) the loan is discharged, but you have to treat the discharged amount as taxable income for the year it’s discharged. Also, if you make your monthly payment ($0 for anon), your loan doesn’t accrue interest that month.

  • frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    31
    ·
    13 days ago

    numbers don’t check out

    lists $2250 expenses… 100 hours of work per month would cover it

    I know they have other expenses, but they failed to list them and failed to make their point.

    • Bloxlord
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      13 days ago

      100 hours of work if the money is tax free (it’s not). Taxes take about 40% of your gross income so on $23/hr hr can’t afford the listed bills.

      • NeptuneOrbit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        46
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        13 days ago

        By my estimation and IRS calculator, his tax liability is probably under 20%. Probably. This assumes about 15% is being taken out for healthcare and retirement however, so yeah, the net paycheck will be approximately 30-40% lower than gross.

        I’d estimate OP has $440 a month left over after all the list expenses.

        • Technoguyfication@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          38
          ·
          edit-2
          12 days ago

          $440 per month to pay for gas, utilities, phone bill, insurance, incidentals, etc. You can forget about savings completely.

          I don’t think OP is too far off the mark.

        • KevonLooney
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          12 days ago

          Use this tax calculator; it includes FICA, state taxes, and local taxes:

          https://smartasset.com/taxes/income-taxes

          No one is paying 40% total tax rate unless they are single, make $350,000+, and live in a high tax area (NYC, San Francisco). If you are married, you have to make at least $800,000 to pay 40% overall.

          • NeptuneOrbit@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 days ago

            That’s what I used. Still some question about how much nontaxable retirement/Healthcare as well as what the state taxes would be. I estimated $5,700 in federal and $1000 in state. Based on 10% to retirement and $2400 a year for insurance, right off the top, and a 3% state tax.

      • TexMexBazooka
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        12 days ago

        Nowhere in the USA will you be taxed 40% of your income, I’m amazed such a blatantly obvious statement is being so heavily upvoted

        • Bloxlord
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          12 days ago

          Look through the thread and you will see people showing their work and coming up with similar numbers. 40% was a rough estimate off the top of my head. Figures from a recent paystub of mine: gross income of $2700.80, net income of $1774.41. My deductions are more than just taxes, but regardless that is an effective reduction in pay of %35.31. This is a real life figure that the others may be similarly subjected to, as opposed to the numbers you get out of a calculator.

          • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            12 days ago

            I’d be glad if rich people paid 40% tax.

            But it is closer to 4%, while they could easily pay 95%.

            Taxes are not the problem. They are necessary for a functioning society. And if other people avoid paying taxes, that means YOU will have to pay more. Because the money will have to come from somewhere.

            I’d gladly pay 90% taxes if it meant the rest of my expenses were provided by the government.

            • dorron@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              12 days ago

              In the UK if you earn over £100k you effectively get taxed 60% (using PAYE)

              I’d happily pay 75% if it meant public services were actually effective, but we have the double whammy of high taxation and crumbling services - that’s what over a decade of conservative rule does… Here’s to the next 4 years!

          • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 days ago

            Look through the thread and you will see people showing their work and coming up with similar numbers.

            I’ve not seen anyone so far in this thread quoting 40% taxes. Looking at

            I just pulled my paystub (single income household) and I’m at 37% of income going to taxes and full benefits (including 7% to my 401k) covering my whole family while not making much more than the OP

  • Soggytoast
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 days ago

    Kids keep going to college with the promise of making 400k/year, but normies don’t get that. College is good and all but employers generally don’t care which college you went to, or your major (if not directly related), what matters is who you became friends with in college, and who their parents/uncles are.

    Better off studying something specific, vocational schools, trade schools. Learn something specific, either no or small loan

    • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      11 days ago

      employers generally don’t care which college you went to

      It’s a little worse than that. College provides a useful socio-economic barrier for unethical employers. They can hide in plain sight by requiring a degree, knowing it’s going to cull out a whole class of people. Working to keep college unaffordable may be another part in this strategy; they’re pulling the ladder up at the same time. Parents and students overcommitting on loans are doing all they can to bash back against all this, even if they don’t know it at the time.

    • Kusimulkku
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      I mean could lose the job, apartment, even their life. It’s not a risk many are willing to take.

      • uis
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        12 days ago

        I mean could lose the job

        So, chains

        • Kusimulkku
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 days ago

          “I’ve finally lost my chains” says the man now unable to pay for apartment, food.

            • Kusimulkku
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              11 days ago

              “Thanks to losing my chains, I’m even worse off than before”, area man told told The Onion. “I highly recommend it.”

        • Kusimulkku
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 days ago

          I definitely rather struggle to make ends meet than be dead, if that’s what you mean.