My old 3770K desktop from 2014, today: soviet-chad

My laptop from 2017, today: holden-bloodfeast

  • RION [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    if the laptop cpu could draw as much power and be cooled as well as your desktop it wouldn’t be so bad, but that’s the compromise for portability shrug-outta-hecks

    but also a problem due to intel stagnation until amd gave them a good kick in the pants with ryzen.

    • SnAgCu [he/him, any]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      i’m looking at it and I’m pretty sure I could easily accept this thing being about twice as thick and 0.5kg heavier. If I ever retire this I’m finding one that has real cooling, if any still exist.

      • unperson [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not just cooling but also battery draw.

        You could buy a 2 kg laptop with a 45 W CPU, but then it’d barely be portable and after a few years the battery will last half an hour, what’s the point.

        What you want to know is called the thermal design power: TDP, and you can look up the data sheet for the CPU in the laptop to know what it is. 15-22 W is typical, 30-45 W what you find in “workstation” laptops and small desktops, 60-120 W in desktops.

      • TerminalEncounter [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        I remember some of the T H I C C laptops of the early 00s, and I remember why people pushed for thinner and lighter - but I agree, I actually wouldn’t mind them getting thicker again for better battery life or better cooling or whatever, the Air style of thin laptops are kind of a silly default marketing strategy in an era where everything’s already pretty thin.