Pitbulls are a mainly a reflection of the owner, stop blaming the pups.

  • Iraglassceiling [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    I will effort post pitbulls if people want. There’s a ton of veterinary literature that contradicts the stereotypes and adds context to bite statistics, etc.

    As a veterinarian if I were to cast shade on a dog breed it would be brachycephalic - pugs or Bostons or bulldogs. Not because of their behavior, but because they’re essentially being waterboarded by their own anatomy every time they breathe and it’s cruel to breed them without taking steps to reduce the airway abnormalities that are incompatible with life.

  • pooh [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    I agree 100%. I had to call 2 vet offices to convince them to change the breed on her paperwork from “pitbull mix” to “brown lab mix” just to be able to move into an apartment, because I guess insurance companies in the area like to ban certain breeds from properties they insure. She’s the sweetest dog you’ll ever meet, though.

    • EmotionalSupportLancet [undecided]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Eh, all dogs are capable of biting. It would make more sense to say that about larger type of dog, imo.

      It’s valid to be aware of the fact any dog has the potential to bite, though. So that’s something I can agree on respecting.

      • I always try to remain respectful of the power of animals. But when it comes to dogs, I’ve never heard of a Golden Retriever or a chocolate lab mauling someone. Startle response bites, sure.

        I could just be another dolt who’s been taken in by fear mongering towards pitties, I don’t know the statistics. But I try to keep in mind the potential for what they could do, same for Dobermans, Germans, Akitas etc. Also, the aggressive little ankle biters, but I’ll usually just pick them up and they don’t know what to do.

  • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The right will never let go of this. Maintaining the normalised idea of genetic behavioural traits in animals is a fundamental requirement for eugenics and racism. If they concede it’s untrue they will also have to concede that the asiatic hordes are not predisposed to barbarian acts of pillaging and looting everywhere they go.

  • CommCat [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    if it’s just a reflection on the owners, then should pitbull owners (or any dangerous breed of dogs) be required to have their background checked before? Like firearms. I would be scared everyday if my neighbours had a breed of dog that was high on the list of dog attacks. Too many instances of people getting mauled to death or with left with horrible deformities because of bad owners.

    • EmotionalSupportLancet [undecided]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      All dog owners should be licensed, all dogs are a reflection of the owner. The difference is a bad dog owner with a chihuahua only hurts the dog and not other people.

      also, if somebody is scared of dogs it’s not hard to learn how defend against one (edit: assuming able and of average strength).They should look into that before being racist against certain types of dogs.

      • Llewellyn
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        it’s not hard to learn how defend against one

        Good luck to elder people or children trying to defend themselves from a pitbull.

        • EmotionalSupportLancet [undecided]@hexbear.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You are right. I should correct my statement to say: an able bodied individual of average size is more than capable of defending against a large dog if they have put any effort into learning how.

          It is, of course, still the duty of the dogs owner to make sure that does not come into play as a factor.

          Just as PSA: if in a situation where you need to survive a dog attack, pull apart the front legs. It’s gross and brutal, but it quickly and easily ends their ability to harm anyone. The amount of force it takes is within the average human upper body strength. DeEscalation is preferable of course, but if it’s a bad situation that shit works.

    • Outdoor_Catgirl [she/her, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Pits are more dangerous than other dog breeds, but not uniquely dangerous. People buy pits because they want a violent dangerous dog, and then train the dog to be just that. It becomes a vicious cycle.

      • EmotionalSupportLancet [undecided]@hexbear.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        No they are not. The jaw strength thng ignores what actually matters. The “lockjaw myth” is just that.

        It’s entirely about “what breed is abused the most”. If size mattered Labradors and German shepherds would be maligned. The thing is the people who abuse dogs and then them into weapons (privately, the state does do this to GS/malamute/Belgian shepherds) choose pitbulls (a loose term to begin with). You are correct the oart of your comment that points this out.

  • Smeagolicious [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Different breeds of dogs do have differences in behavior, see hunting & working dogs, but that doesn’t mean pit bulls are walking murder machines. The reputation surrounding pit bulls is 99.9% mainly racially motivated fearmongering.