“(With) today’s Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity, that fundamentally changed. For all practical purposes, there are virtually no limits on what the president can do. It’s a fundamentally new principle and it’s a dangerous precedent because the power of the office will no longer be constrained by the law even including the supreme court of the United States.”

Throughout his address, Biden underscored the gravity of the moment, emphasizing that the only barrier to the president’s authority now lies in the personal restraint of the officeholder. He warned vehemently against the prospect of Trump returning to power, painting a stark picture of the dangers such an outcome could pose.

    • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m reminded of all the “France Surrenders” memes I’ve seen. Meanwhile the French shut down their country at the suggestion of the retirement age increasing. An unelected group of 6 people decide your king president can do whatever they want with no consequence and Americans just shake their fists at the cloud complain online.

      • UltraGiGaGigantic
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Didn’t the French have to recently choose between a shitter who fucked them over (Macron) and putins nazi buddy (Le pen)?

        Man, we really are more alike then we realize.

    • Zombie-Mantis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      The infrastructure for a national strike does not exist in America. You need a lot of labor to be organized, and it just isn’t. We can barely get individual facilities to go on strike, let alone an entire country. We used to, and that’s how we pressured politicians into the New Deal, but organized labor has been dismantled since then.

      As for why we’re not more like the French, a lot of it comes down to this: They have more unionized workers, as a fraction of the working population, than we do.

      Perhaps we forget, here on our islands of leftist beliefs, but the average American is not a radical Socialist, Communist, or Anarchist. They are not tuned-in closely to politics, they are not media literate, they are not part of any active organization besides maybe a local church. They’re not going to upend their lives over something they don’t understand, without any way to plan with their coworkers.

      • hempster
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Let me remind you of Civil Rights strikes and protests

        • UltraGiGaGigantic
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          "First, I must confess that over the last few years I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro’s great stumbling block in the stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen’s Council-er or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to “order” than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says “I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can’t agree with your methods of direct action;” who paternalistically feels he can set the timetable for another man’s freedom; who lives by the myth of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait until a “more convenient season.”

          Shallow understanding from people of goodwill is more frustrating than absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will. Lukewarm acceptance is much more bewildering than outright rejection."

          • MLK jr
      • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        We used to, and that’s how we pressured politicians into the New Deal, but organized labor has been dismantled since then.

        It’s the downside of very rapid economic and social development in USA as compared to France since then. When things are changing so fast, some you just lose, maybe don’t even think you need them anymore, and have to build them again.

        EDIT: And most of the planet is less conscious than the French for this matter.

    • ours@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Terrible timing to bring up the French. They are scrambling to prevent the most right-wing turn since WWII.

    • anticolonialist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Always beware of the fact, that the only thing hindering an all-out revolution is your fear of losing the scraps they throw at you. Gore Vidal

    • irotsoma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Because we’re exhausted and can’t afford to lose what little we all have. Even one day in jail can mean losing your job, even if charges are dropped. And a conviction could mean being stuck with only jobs that don’t pay a living wage for the rest of your life and few of us have enough savings to survive that for long.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      I don’t understand why we aren’t in the streets.

      We were in the streets for Palestine and then some seriously bad shit happened.

        • colmear@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Isn’t that exactly the reason for the second amendment? From what I learned, it is not to go to the gun range because it’s fun, it is to fight the government if it goes rogue

          • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            TBF to fight a government that went rogue in our time you’ll need a whole lot more than knowing how to shoot a rifle.

            Field medicine. Chemistry. How to build underground shelters against airstrikes. How to make mortars and mortar shots in garage with commonly available tooling. Using FPV drones, of course. Using (and possibly making) AT shots. Maybe simple (Katyusha-level) artillery manufacturing. Making mines.

            That’s just some of the manufacturing knowledge you’ll need, it’s much more.

            Communications - something easy to get wrong.

            Then - tactics and teamwork, of course. It’s a lot to learn and requires lots of training.

            Logistics. Something which doesn’t seem as hard as the rest, while in fact the hardest.

            And I’m just mentioning things, one can write a book for every one of them.

          • uienia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            It is not. It is the interpretation right wing gunnits have claimed it is, so there is that I suppose…

            • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              They are free to interpret it this way just as you are your way.

              It would be weird for a new polity, result of a winning rebellion against lawful government, and definitely against its laws (some people think one can rebel not breaking any laws, apparently, claiming there are legal and illegal rebellions), to not have this in mind frankly.

              And from the context of the second amendment we know that back then it was interpreted exactly as a militia that can fight against federal military.

              One can argue in theory that this doesn’t mean individual gun rights, just that states should have their own armies (national guard). One can’t argue that it’s not intended for rebellion, because it very openly was.

        • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          3 days ago

          Not everyone needs to fight cops in the streets (respect and support to those that do!). There are other ways to fight as well: organizing strikes, sabotage, [redacted]. I think the main problem is that the fascism pot has been simmering for so long, that people are mostly used to it, and can no longer really imagine the alternative. We’re so isolated from each other, and desperate to survive that too many of us will “keep calm and carry on” as long as it isn’t our necks on the chopping block.