Sir Keith has delivered a whopping 1.7% higher vote share for Labour than they got in 2019, when Sir Keith intentionally sabotaged Corbyn with his “People’s Vote” maneuver, and 6% less than Corbyn in 2017.
Sir Keith has delivered a whopping 1.7% higher vote share for Labour than they got in 2019, when Sir Keith intentionally sabotaged Corbyn with his “People’s Vote” maneuver, and 6% less than Corbyn in 2017.
Contrary to Liberal interpretations, this ruling doesn’t change much. If the President was capable of openly assassinating politicians, or launching a military coup to overthrow democracy, they would not be deterred by 9 people in black robes telling them they may be liable to criminal charges in the future for doing so.
Until the Chief Justice gets their own division to command, the Court only has as much power over the Federal Government as they are allowed to, which is invariably determined by their usefulness to politically dominant factions of Capital. See what happened after the Marshall Court made a decision impeding the interests early-American Capital had in forcefully dispossessing Indigenous peoples from their land.
I still believe the most incisive commentary on the Law’s function in society was given by Marx. He succinctly attacks the Liberal idea that all social structures (economics, politics, etc.) arise from the letter of the law. Rather:
Society is not founded upon the law; this is a legal fiction. On the contrary, the law must be founded upon society, it must express the common interests and needs of society — as distinct from the caprice of the individuals — which arise from the material mode of production prevailing at the given time. This Code Napoleon, which I am holding in my hand, has not created modern bourgeois society. On the contrary, bourgeois society, which emerged in the eighteenth century and developed further in the nineteenth, merely finds its legal expression in this Code. As soon as it ceases to fit the social conditions, it becomes simply a bundle of paper.
The process of legally converting a business to an employee-owned cooperative can vary significantly depending on what jurisdiction you’re in. There’s different criteria for creating one (some places might require more than 3 directors to create a Coop) and all sorts of statutory considerations unique to wherever you are.
If you’re serious about doing this, I would sincerely recommend reaching out for legal advice first. This is your livelihood, and you do not want to make a mistake that creates difficulty down the line. Depending on where you live, there may be a public interest organization, or business law clinic, that can provide some legal information for free. You could look up “(where you live) non profit legal assistance” and see if anything shows up.
The ruling is hilarious. An Indiana mayor awarded a $1.1 million dollar contract to a truck dealership, then went to the dealership afterwards and said “I need money.” He asked for $15k in cash, and was given $13k.
According to the SCOTUS this is not bribery because a bribe is an award for pre-agreed actions that is quid pro quo, and maybe the dealer just happened to feel generous to the person responsible for awarding them a lucrative contract after the fact. Only money in burlap sacks with dollar bills on them, with a person handing it over with a contract saying “this is a bribe” count as a bribe. Anything else is just a sparkling gratuity.
A suspended sentence doesn’t mean you get to walk free. It means you’re released into the community but subject to a probation order which if broken will have you sent to prison. The conditions always have a “peace and good behaviour” obligation but can also include onerous restrictions. Anyone who works with offenders knows that the conditions imposed by a suspended sentence can be deeply intrusive and severely curtail people’s privacy and freedom of movement, to the point where they may sometimes be harsher than fines or even imprisonment
Providing for suspended sentences for first offences is consistent with the criminal justice system’s commitment to rehabilitation, even if it arguably is of a lesser deterrent value and doesn’t satisfy the desire for vengeance among much of the public.
I’m unfamiliar with Ireland’s criminal law, and the judge may have been more lenient than they had to be, but its not impossible that there’s enough mitigating factors that the sentence will not get appealed. If Crotty breaks the terms of his suspended sentence, and commits a similar act in the future, his sentence will almost certainly be considerably harsher.
I used to think that one of the worst takeaway of the Nuclear Arms race was that if you do nothing about an existential threat to humanity long enough, it will eventually go away. Now I realize the average Western leader who lived through the Cold War has decided its real meaning is that the risks of nuclear weapons don’t need to be taken seriously because there’s no chance they’ll ever be used.
Did Yemen ever learn why the US doesn’t have free healthcare?
It speaks to a deeper fault in liberalism, made obvious by the existence of homelessness.
A person is free only to the extent in which they have access to a physical space in which they can exercise that freedom. It would be absurd to say that I have freedom of speech, if they were banned from speaking freely at home, in public, or anywhere but inside my head. Without a place in which a person can go to and enjoy the protections of a right, they do not actually have that right.
A core tenet of classical Liberalism is that the only place in which our government recognizes the sanctity of a person’s ability to exercise their rights, is upon their own land. On public spaces, or the property of others, the exercise of rights may be readily curtailed, and always have been. This fits in nicely with the traditional Liberal notion that only people with property are citizens, whose rights deserve to be safeguarded.
However, for the homeless their ‘freedoms’ are illusory because they have no personal space to physically go to and enjoy it. Instead, the liberty of a homeless person to do anything (ie: sleep and eat) is strictly curtailed to the very limited range of activities permitted on public lands. And their right to protection from certain things (ie: invasions of privacy and involuntary search/seizure) similarly has virtually no guarantees.
This is also something I always emphasize when discussions of banning certain activities from any public spaces comes up. To ban encampments on all public property is to deprive our society’s most vulnerable of any right to shelter themselves from the elements, or sleep undisturbed, as they will no longer have legal access to places in which they can shelter or sleep.
If Dengists were Bernsteinists that’d be an improvement. In this thread they’re indistinguishable from Neoliberal commentators from the Cato Institute writing articles about “the Feminist side of sweatshops” only instead of “basic economics” being the reason why we have to support states that are in direct opposition to working class interests, here its “material conditions” and “contradictions.”
The Double Jeopardy Clause doesn’t protect a person from being prosecuted by both a state and the US federal government. State governments are considered separate sovereigns from the federal government, and in the US all sovereigns have the power to prosecute a person whose charges are within their jurisdiction, irregardless of the actions of another. For instance Timothy Hennis was acquitted in North Carolina for the alleged 1985 murder of a family, then retried decades later for the same crimes by a US Army Court Martial and convicted.
I think you are misunderstanding how the criminal law work based on your hypothetical. If someone commits a murder while trespassing they are not committing a single crime consisting of those two elements, rather they are committing two crimes (murder and trespassing) and will be charged for both separately. The circumstances in which a murder takes place may determine which sovereign has jurisdiction over it, but it will only determines whether a separate offence has occurred if a penal code provides that.
There’s a test (Blockburger) for determining whether offences are separate enough to be retried, and nowhere does the wording of the prosecution play a role in it.
Worth noting that this alleged coup is occuring in the “Republic of Congo” (aka: Congo-Brazzaville) and not its neighbour, the far more populous and significantly poorer per capita, “Democratic Republic of Congo”.
Some very brief context is that while the DRC (a former Belgian colony) under Mobutu was firmly on the side of the United States during the Cold War in Africa,the then People’s Republic of the Congo (a former French colony) was a Communist state with deep relations to the Soviet Union. However, following the fall of the USSR, the PRC dissolved, the Republic of the Congo was coerced into joining the CFA zone, and France has exerted a great degree amount of influence over the economy and politics of the ROC ever since. Though its worth noting that relations between Congo and Russian are increasingly solid, with a growing number of military, economic, and other billateral cooperation agreements being made between the two countries.
Its impossible to make conclusions at the moment, but this seems to be yet another blow to Françafrique by another military government that wishes to follow the example of others on the continent in unshackling their country from French Neocolonialism.
lmao the press release even said the quiet part out loud, that this is her reward for bringing Finland into NATO
Ms Marin has a record of accomplishment, from setting one of the world’s most ambitious climate targets – enabled by a full programme of digitalisation and deployment of technology – to shepherding her country’s accession to NATO following Russia’s aggression in Ukraine (the swiftest accession in the alliance’s history).
I completely agree with you, and on a related note the almost uniformly higher rates of transit usage in Canada compared to the US (with the exception of the massive anomaly that is NYC) is an interesting source for discussion, and one which cannot be explained by disparities in urban transit infrastructure alone.
That almost all Canadian cities have a rapid transit system of some kind certainly helps their numbers, but even cities in the US with considerably better systems, by most metrics, tend to underperform their Canadian peers. For instance, in 2016 the Canadian capital of Ottawa (a massive city filled with suburbs and rural towns, which then had no rail system whatsoever, and whose slow, unreliable, and infrequent buses are a constant source of complaint) had a higher transit modal share than Washington DC or Chicago, both mostly dense urban cores with extensive heavy rail metros.
I was about to type up an entire essay on the topic, but to be brief I see the cause of Canada’s relatively more transit oriented populace to come down to the fact that White flight/suburbanization didn’t happen to quite the same extent there (the reasons for which you could write a book on). Something which ensured that downtowns remained hubs of jobs and people, rather than wastelands of parking lots. Simultaneously, because urban centres weren’t imagined as places of a terrifying racialized other, to quite the same extent as in the US, transit was not demonized as much and middle-class Canadians were consequently more willing to allow themselves (and their children) to use it.
If I’m remembering right that commentor went on to give a very optimistic prognosis for the counteroffensive. Arguing that because the first line of Russian defences near Robotyne had breached: Tokmak will be captured imminently, putting the entire Russian logistical network under threat and severing the land bridge to Crimea, which will then lead to the total collapse of Russian military power in southern Ukraine. It’s a nice story but one completely divorced from the actual reality of the counteroffensive.
deleted by creator
The artist plays both sides so she always stays on top
To be fair Tommy did lead Auburn to a 13-0 season in 2004, meanwhile what have the haters and losers in the Pentagon accomplished in the last two decades, Losing in Afghanistan?
I can see why a natural-born leader of men like Mr. Tuberville would be absolutely disgusted at the sad state of the Pentagon these days, maybe if they nominated Nick Saban to replace General Milley things would be different and he’d be glad to confirm him.
The Republican senator blocking hundreds of military leadership promotions and nominations has told Fox News that Ukraine cannot win in a war against Russia.
“We’re not getting the point in Washington DC,” Mr Tuberville said. “I haven’t voted for a dime to send Ukraine. I’m for Ukraine. Russia should have never done this.”
“But at the end of the day, it’s a junior high team playing a college team,” he said. “They can’t win. We can throw all the money we want to, but unless we send NATO and our troops over, which we’re not going to do if I’ve got anything to do with it, then there’s no chance.”
Hilarious that the person currently doing more than anyone else to disrupt the National Security state is a dipshit good ol’ boy Senator who understands the world through College Football metaphors.
“Marxism, Marxism-Leninism.” Very bad idea to name a scientific world-view after individuals. Way too subjective and besides too many bad stories and nightmares associated with it. And, not very working-class sounding: too many syllables and hyphens. Replace it with “scientific socialism” or the “socialist and communist idea.”
Explains a lot that a leading figure in the CPUSA had argued that working class dum-dums simply can’t understand words with hyphens or too many syllables. Also fantastic to call the term Marxism-Leninism too subjective, only to ask that it be renamed “socialist and communist idea.”
One of the greatest strengths of neoliberal reformists in Iran is that they are the side less associated with decades of violently enforced moralism, especially the mandatory hijab. For millions of Iranians striking back against the Guidance Patrol at home is a more prescient issue than their country’s policy abroad.
Ideally there’d be a Socialist voice supporting multipolarism, the working class, and freedom from moralistic dictates, but the very forces aligned with Jalili have plenty of responsibility for such a voice not existing.