• negativeyoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    96
    ·
    1 year ago

    Japan is another world. When I was traveling there, I remember seeing dots on the highways so as to space your interval with the car in front of you. Another person in my group started laughing because that would be ignored in the US but the guy driving was confused and couldn’t fathom not following that rule. He was like, “why wouldn’t you do that?”

      • Dicska@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That’s a funny way to spell Earth.

        EDIT: I meant that this isn’t just a US problem. There are way too many selfish people worldwide, and they are one of the many reasons we still haven’t made proper steps to avoid an ecological disaster. I don’t really get the downvotes.

    • Ellatsu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      They have those dots on the road in some parts of PA, specifically around Lancaster. Some people follow the 2 dot rule there, but most I’ve seen do not.

      • SHOW_ME_YOUR_ASSHOLE
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve seen them on route 41 in PA and I can’t ever remember seeing anyone maintaining a two-dot following distance.

        • Cavemanfreak
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Fwiw, it’s the three-second rule. And why not use a visual help when there is one?

          • Brainhemmed@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Three is definitely better but a lot of places do go by the two-second rule. And obviously use the visual aid if there is one. The point is to learn to use a fixed point to time it. If you only learn to count how many dots/lines there are, you might struggle when there aren’t any obvious markings.

            • Cavemanfreak
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Your last point is fair! I didn’t mean to imply that you should only use markings. It sounds a bit stupid to still reach the two second rule though, since the average reaction time seems to be 1-1.5s. If you need to break abruptly 0.5s won’t get you very far.

          • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I learned the two seconds rule, actually. And from personal experience, that seems quite enough.three seconds would out rather large distances that tend to fill up with other cars

            Just saying that the two (or three,) second rule can be applied anywhere and everywhere

            • Cavemanfreak
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Really? You should probably go for the three second rule though, since the average reaction time seems to be 1-1.5s. That will not give you time enough to stop if needed.

              I do agree with other drivers being idiots and not leaving enough room though, it’s really annoying.

              • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                I have actually never heard of the 3 second rule, just 2 as I was taught in the Netherlands. and believe me, driving rules in the Netherlands are rigourous.

                In practice it depends where you drive. 3 second rule in the Netherlands might work. In Canada maybe, in Mexico definitely not (there they have the .1 seconds rule and a LOT of head tail collisions)