To make solar power viable, we need a solution for overnight energy storage.

Batteries are complicated.

Do you know what isn’t? Water go up. stonks-up

  • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    It seems like you’d lose a fair bit of energy from powering the pump and from the turbine not capturing 100% but I don’t actually know how it compares to other types of energy storage. To me it seems like you’re probably better off heating something up, like turning that pool of water into steam, or finding a material that can absorb a lot of heat but I have no actual data on that.

    • ReallyZen@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      You’re talking about Thermal Storage, indeed a complex and costly field in the research for out-of-optimal conditions for electricity production I.e. nighttime for solar power

        • OgdenTO [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          Turbines are extremely efficient (close to 100%), and almost all large scale power sources use them already (nuclear, hydro). Powering the pump isn’t “lost” energy, it’s the energy transformed from solar into potential energy from pumping.