• FloridaBoi [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      We had a family live with us for a few months one summer and YouTube did all of the parenting for hours on end everyday for kids 8-15

  • angrytoadnoises@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    3 months ago

    literal ghoulish depictions of the image of man dreamed up by the soulless

    i hate thumbnails. i hate search engine optimization. i hate algorithms. i miss feeling like people on the internet were ever at all genuine

    • Nora@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 months ago

      Sadly this would probably get a bunch of views. Just make it a nerf blaster or something as like the cherry on top click bait.

  • SorosFootSoldier [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    3 months ago

    It took me a couple of years but I managed to curate my yt feed to only show me stuff I will actually watch and yet I’m still one misclick away from getting Little Ben Shapiro and PragerU shoved down my throat.

    • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      Just turn off watch history (turns off recommendations and the home page) and use the subscription feed exclusively. Suggested videos will only appear based on your currently watched video, so completely unpersonalized

      • AernaLingus [any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        This is what I’ve done for ages and it works like a charm (although unfortunately search is still terrible, no saving that mess). Well, I only got around to disabling watch history in the last year or so, but I’ve been going directly to the sub feed for almost as long as YouTube has existed. I think the only time I actually used the front page was in the very early days of YouTube when it was actually a little community and you’d have featured videos and stuff, but that was like 15 years ago.

  • ClimateChangeAnxiety [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 months ago

    I think it’s notable that Mr Beast has switched away from the open mouth smile in favor of the closed mouth smile and the others haven’t caught up yet

    I definitely find the closed mouth less annoying (still sucks, just less) and I know Mr Beast tests shit like that to an extreme degree so it probably gets more views

    • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Use DeArrow! It not only removes clickbait thumbnails, but replaces them with community-sourced ones, allowing one to choose a thumbnail frame from the video and have it better put up for a vote, and it does the same thing for the video’s title! It’s made by the same guy who made Sponsorblock.

    • milk_thief [it/its]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      I use Mr. Beastify for that bc I like to suffer, but having the Beast everywhere makes it warp back to around not being annoying anymore for some reason and sometimes he shows up under a red triangle or something like that :3

  • Thordros [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 months ago

    There is a special corner of my heart that is reserved solely for how much I hate those FGTV motherfuckers. It’s just a couple of rich assholes spoiling their kids with every fucking treat on the planet.

    • g_g [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      no, see, here’s the thing… how does every single one of these look WORSE than the slop Dall-E spits out??? why don’t they just have the ai make the thumbnails instead of this???

      • AlicePraxis [any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        3 months ago

        it looks worse in the sense that it’s an obvious photoshop where the subject was badly composited into the scene. AI might not have that same issue but would look worse in so many other ways like generating weird blobby nonsense

        AI also probably won’t do a good job at making someone’s exact face unless you train a model on lots pictures of the person which takes time, effort and knowledge of how AI works. it would actually be a lot more difficult to get a passable AI result than just slapping a picture of your stupid face on a background image

        • KobaCumTribute [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          There’s IPadapter for SD models which only requires a single photo at runtime, though I don’t know exactly how strong its adherence is. There’s also training a LORA which would only require a few images and take maybe a day at the most, which would be an easy investment of time and resources for someone who wants to churn out tons of images with that one face on them. And of course there’s the simplest method of all: just crudely pasting the desired face into the image and then sending it for a low denoise img2img pass to make the inscrutable machine integrate it into the image better.

          That level of extremely basic and rudimentary technical knowledge is probably beyond the influencers themselves, but certainly not beyond whatever flunky they pay to maintain their brand like that, at which point it’s probably self-preservation and not wanting to create an automated process that can replace themselves that stops them from using that approach.