• CrushKillDestroySwag@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Measurement systems, especially time measurement, is the one thing everybody should absolutely agree on for the sake of sanity of everyone.

    I disagree with this premise. I think that standardization is highly valuable, but there’s absolutely no reason everyone everywhere should use the same systems.

    • space_comrade [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think that standardization is highly valuable, but there’s absolutely no reason everyone everywhere should use the same systems.

      I mean I guess there are exceptions like remote tribes living mostly independently of the global human civilization but other than that I can’t see a reason why you wouldn’t want a standardized measurement system.

      • CrushKillDestroySwag@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Measurements should be relevant to daily life, and come in increments that are useful to daily tasks. Metric was primarily designed to look good on paper, which isn’t surprising when you consider that it was dreamed up by a bunch of fancy lads who never made things with their hands. We’re all kind of stuck with it now for a lot of reasons, but I believe that it is suboptimal.

    • a_blanqui_slate [none/use name, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Having actually tried to teach dimensional analysis and conversion factors to students, the fact that we even have two commonly used systems is too many.

      We’ve already crashed a spaceship because of this. The practical need for any group of people in regular communication to adopt a single unit system far outways any ideological objections to it.