• t�m@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can’t forgive student debt can’t pay for healthcare yet we can have war, ffs

      • knfrmity@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sort of. The US government has created the extraordinary privilege of dollar hegemony, which lets them issue money ad nauseum at the expense of the rest of the world. This privilege ends when the rest of the world stops underwriting this debt, as is slowly happening under the broad name of dedollarization.

  • GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    “defense” industry lapdogs absolutely drooling at the steak Genocide Joe’s dangling over their heads

  • neglector0669@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    While I’m openly in favor of supporting Ukraine, it’s important to note that the vast majority of this type of military aid is provided in kind.

    So really, it’s a proposal to give US Defense contractors $100b+ to replenish and restock the DOD with new kit and munitions for the old kit and munitions that we’re providing to Ukraine. Which then get into the use accounting tricks e.g. depreciation values, etc.

    The annual military aid to Israel is a little different, it’s more like a loss leader coupon: give Israel money that they have to spend with US Defense contractors, which then also incentivizes them spending their own budget on complementary systems that can be integrated with those systems, munitions, support contracts, etc.

    Although in this case, I believe it’s primarily munitions and other kit that the DOD already has in warehouses.

    This is oversimplified, but I just see these headline figures always being confused for pallets of cash.

    • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I don’t live in Ukraine. I need healthcare now. Let Blackrock and Vanguard fund Ukraine.

      • UniquesNotUseful@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        24
        ·
        1 year ago

        Did you have healthcare before Russia invaded Ukraine and started murdering babies? Was it even on the cards?

        It’s not an economic factor either. US health costs are much higher than other developed nations. It spends 17% of GDP, almost double of Germany (next highest).

        Spending is without the positive outcomes. Infant mortality of 5.4 deaths per 1,000 live births (17,000 extra dead babies a year Vs an average.rate), for context you are worse than Russia with 4.9 but better tha Chile 5.9). 23.8 maternal deaths per 100,000 births being 3 times higher than most wealthy nations.

        The economic considerations are that you have a lot of heath businesses. If you socialised medicine and reduced spend, you may improve health outcomes but how would they pay for the very nice buildings they have loans for?

        Finally, US doesn’t want universal healthcare as a society. Whilst they may be financially wrecked by costs and live shorter more painful lives, that is far preferential than seeing the low income family get the same free cancer treatment for their child.

        • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nice rhetoric. I’ve wanted healthcare since 2009, when the “Yes we can” guy didn’t. Your talking points have been disproven and Americans polled overwhelmingly want nationalized healthcare. Source. You provided no source because you pulled it out of your actuarial ass.

        • limonfiesta@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Did you have healthcare before Russia invaded Ukraine

          Yes, I did until they sent me a letter informing me that they were booting me off my Medicare for All plan and converting it into artillery shells for the Kherson offensive.

      • neglector0669@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        23
        ·
        1 year ago

        We aren’t getting it eitherway, so in the meantime, at least some of our weapons are being used to defend against an imperial power, instead of to advance one.

        • regul
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You think the US isn’t funding Ukraine to advance its own imperial interests?

          You truly think we’re just doing it because we just love “democracy” so much, or something like that?

          Buddy, an imperial power is winning either way.

        • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I don’t think the next generation is going to accept that excuse, nor should they. Enlightened Centrism is what got us to this point.

    • glimse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sweet! So it’ll help the rich get richer and won’t help any of us who don’t work on the defense industry. Love it!

      • neglector0669@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’d try to explain the geostrategic and humanitarian benefits to helping one of the world’s largest bread baskets defend against imperial conquest by an mafia run gas station, or do a deeper dive into Putin’s desire to reconquer the old USSR satellite states, or the associated risks if he was successful, but I don’t think you really care to have you opinion shaped by analysis and the realities of great power poltics, so I’ma leave you be.

        • glimse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I fully support giving aid to Ukraine. Just not so sure about funding the destruction of Palestine by a country with one of the world’s strongest economies

          • neglector0669@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I never said I supported funding Israel’s military, I don’t. I just added that mini explainer because it’s a different method of military aid than we provide Ukraine, and the proposal is bundled together.

            • glimse@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Sorry, this is on me - I should have been more clear in my first reply. I just think it’s fucked up that we’re spending all this money to support genocide when “we couldn’t afford” to spend on US citizens. Defense contractors make a shit ton of money from war and the rest of us won’t have anything to show for it. Again, speaking strictly about the middle east. Russia is a significant threat to the world so I’m fine with my tax dollars are going toward stopping their bullshit.

    • superguy
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      So really, it’s a proposal to give US Defense contractors $100b+ to replenish and restock the DOD with new kit and munitions for the old kit and munitions that we’re providing to Ukraine.

      Interesting distinction, but I don’t think it changes the fact that US taxpayers paid defense contractors to produce these weapons which we then give away to other nations. It’d be one thing if we sold them, then that’d be a foreign nation’s money helping the US economy. But because these were paid for with US tax dollars and will be given away, it’s essentially a free payday for defense contractors while US citizens see none of the benefit.

      This is what makes defense spending different than other social services. The money spent on weapons that we give away could be better spent on things that help us here, like housing, healthcare, education, food, etc.

          • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            The US has blocked every opportunity for a negotiated peace, thereby causing tens of thousands of needless deaths, with nothing to show for it. The National Interest: How Will the Ukraine War End?

            In the early weeks of the war, peace was still possible before the unimaginable loss of life, the devastation of infrastructure, and the loss of land in Ukraine. That peace was possible three times: in talks in Belarus, in talks mediated by then-Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennet, and, most promisingly, in talks in Istanbul. In all three, the war could have been ended on terms that satisfied Ukraine. In all three, Ukraine was willing to renounce membership in NATO. And, in all three, the United States blocked the negotiations.

      • Zorque@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s a problem for all of us. One of their main goals is making the government look useless, which is what it looks like to a lot of citizens. It may put a minor black mark on Republicans as a whole while they parade their clownshow around, but it puts a much longer lasting stain on the concept of government as a whole for a lot of people. Which is exactly what Republicans want.

  • b9chomps@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I can understand the funds for Ukraine 100%. They are fighting a giant aggressor that has superior numbers.

    But doesn’t Israel have a pretty huge and well equipped army considering their population? Especially compared to Hamas that is a guerrilla force.

    Also the fighting is limited to a area that is fenced in by them, Egypt and the Mediterranean. What kind of new military equipment worth 14 billion would be needed?

    It’s also ironic to support a conflict with 14 billion and on the other side plan 9 billion for humanitarian aid to combat the misery needed because of it.

    • masquenox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Maintaining a settler-colonialist state in the face of people who aren’t just armed with spears takes a lot of money, I guess.

    • PupBiru@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      it’s possible that $14bn is just what’s needed to get republicans to the table to send the rest to ukraine

    • lloydsmart@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I broadly agree with you, but would point out that the conflict isn’t necessarily limited to Gaza. There’ve been rockets flying back and forth across the Lebanese border, sporadic violence in the West Bank, and there’s always tension over the Golan Heights. Israel could find itself fighting a multi-front war against Hamas in Gaza, Lebanon/Hezbollah in the north west, Syria in the north east and Jordan in the east.

      Not to mention Egypt aren’t exactly their best buds either, and a US warship recently intercepted missiles coming towards Israel from Houthi rebels in Yemen.

  • DagonPie@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I wonder what a poll in the US would look like if they let the people vote on this. But its an all or nothing vote. Like we vote to give both countries aid or neither.

      • Squizzy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        The worst part about being pro Ukraine and pro Palestine is realising Ukraine supports Israel.

        • HuddaBudda@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ukraine’s funding disappeared as one of the concessions for the 45 day funding bill while republicans pick a new speaker.

          I think Zelensky is trying to play this smart because it ties something he needs (military funding) to something republicans need to support (Israel)

          Whether or not he agrees with it doesn’t matter, because as a leader this is the best move for him to get funding back.

          • PupBiru@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            100% this… words are cheap, and he needs to do everything he can for his country… supporting palestine or staying silent gets him nothing, and potentially loses quite a bit in retaliation

            it really doesn’t matter what he thinks is fair or just

        • Melkath@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          So I need to vote against supporting Ukraine?

          I feel like you get it, you’re just trolling.

          • superguy
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Your comments seem out of place.

            I don’t think he’s focusing too much on the ‘combined’ support for Israel and Ukraine. I think he’s focusing more on whether or not the American people would support sending aid to either, neither, or both.

            We can split up the votes, if that makes you happy. The point still stands.

            I don’t think most Americans would support sending aid to Israel. I think most of them would support sending aid to Ukraine.

            Unfortunately most Americans don’t support direct voting, so their will is routinely subverted by the bought puppets they put in office.

            • DagonPie@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              This guy seems to get really bent out of shape over my hypothetical and is missing the point of my comment. Hes not even really acknowledging what I had said. I appreciate you trying to explain to them but it doesnt seem worth it haha.

            • Melkath@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Ngl. Only got past your first paragraph.

              Bernie, after much consideration, decided to run against Hilary in the DNC instead of on the Gen.

              Bernie wins.

              The only time in US history, the DNC has an unexplained revote.

              Hilary wins.

              The general election happens.

              Trump wins.

              I can’t go on acting like that didn’t happen. Children can, because they weren’t alive to watch it.

              Those children also didn’t see Bush v Gore, or the towers falling.

              Today’s kids saw none of that. And for some asinine reason, we still don’t educate them.

              Ya… um an American white knuckling (100 percent of us) but still trying how to not white knuckle.

              My best guess, follow the story of Papa Carlin. He was at least smart enough to make sure he was recorded saying the shit and doing what every last one of us does. Die.

  • towelie@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    What happens when we can no longer move balances around and dish out money to maintain the global status quo

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Some Republican lawmakers have grown skeptical of the need to fund Ukraine’s war with Russia, and have threatened to halt government altogether to put an end to chronic U.S. budget deficits and fiscal spending fueled by $31.4 trillion in debt.

    “The world is watching and the American people rightly expect their leaders to come together and deliver on these priorities,” said Biden’s budget director, Shalanda Young, in a letter to acting House Speaker Patrick McHenry.

    She also told Congress of plans to submit another request for funding to deal with natural disasters, high-speed internet, child care and wild-land firefighter pay “in coming days.”

    Some $14.3 billion of Friday’s funding request for the 2024 fiscal year would be dedicated to Israel, much of it to support the country’s air and missile defense systems and other weapons purchases.

    The request includes billions to replenish the country’s military equipment, and would provide economic and security aid and support for refugees in the United States.

    “The unwavering bipartisan support for Ukraine in the United States is incredibly encouraging for all of our warriors and for our entire nation,” Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy wrote on Friday on social media.


    The original article contains 735 words, the summary contains 194 words. Saved 74%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • iforgotmyinstance@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Bro I’m for foreign aid but this is getting insane.

    Give me .01 percent of that and I’d be set for life. Where’s the aid for Americans?