While it would he handy to have everything integrated, it’s not always vital. We don’t need to convert kilograms to seconds very often. Artificially enforced systems have always had trouble replacing older anachronistic ones that are otherwise still useful. Ask people in the UK about their cars’ efficiency and you’ll often get an answer in miles per gallon.

There’s nothing magical about 10, either, other than the accidents of evolution that left us with ten fingers. Base 12 is also extremely convenient, and comes from Sumerians counting with their thumb against each of the three joints on 4 fingers. Go through that process once for each finger on the other hand, and you get 60. And of course, in any industry where things are packed into packages, like nearly everything we buy, dozens fit better than tens. 60 divides very neatly into many convenient and geometrically simple fractions, and a lot of what we do with circles benefits from this.

We probably would have been better standardizing on a base unit that’s a power of two, which has more mathematical weight than ten does.

It may indeed all work out, but I cannot see any possible benefit at all to karma. No matter the intention, it allows opinions to be formed without reading content. People will almost always act like sheep, and too many people will associate karma with legitimacy. I think it would be an incredibly foolish thing to adopt it.

If that’s what you want to take from it, it’s up to you. That was not my intention. What I said is entirely true.

Just because the current system doesn’t do what you want, you think going back to a system of cheating and popularity contests is good? Think carefully about that. Unless you’re the sort who also refuses to listen to music that isn’t on the Top Ten list and only goes to blockbuster movies. If that’s the case, honestly the Fediverse may not be the place for you.

What a thought…we’ll have to form opinions of people based upon what they write, not on points that could always be faked or whored. Popularity is an incredibly stupid measure of quality. I’d like to see the up/down arrow on threads replaced by a simple view counter, too.

Words like this are fun for schoolkids but don’t say anything at all about what was actually done. It’s an effort to take something phenomenally complex and reduce it to a slogan. Slogans are good for fostering outrage, but not much else, and they distract attention from detail. Leave slogans to politics, not history.

It’s an invasive species that has been working its way west across North America. I hadn’t heard of it in SoCal yet; this would be a drag. OP, what lake was it in? There may be rangers or similar authorities you could notify so they could look.

Even Wikipedia results are 20 or more results down. I use Google search less every day.

I’m not commenting on the legality or appropriateness or intelligence of either invasion, but on the nature of the goals behind them.

One was an attempt at forcing a regime change, the other was an attempt at regime elimination and annexation of territory.

Both can and should be criticized, but not for being the same thing. They weren’t.

I wasn’t involved in the decisions, but if it wasn’t defederated I’d have to block it all from my end. You know why, don’t be coy.

My mom was part of that hippie generation that gave LOTR its first taste of success. I read her copies about 1970 or so. That generation of fandom was quite different from what there is today. Now we’ve got volume after volume of additional information and stories and wonderfulness, but back then there was LOTR, The Hobbit, and some scholarly works. We couldn’t even be baffled by the Silmarilion yet!

That’s not the least of what makes me unhappy about the Google search experience lately. The thing I don’t like is how much it sucks. Like, really really sucks. It was the paradigm of mind-boggling usefulness at one point. Now it’s an ad server with occasionally marginally relevant results.

It’s a no-brainer. I was an early addict of Usenet, and never found the same utility and community when everyone left for the bright shiny corporate sites (and usenet became harder and harder to access since it wasn’t making any billionaires richer.) The Fediverse is what is needed to take the internet back. I just feel bad that it took me so long to start. I joined Mastodon in January and am a thousand times more active there than I ever was at the birdsite, because my account is growing and morphing to fit MY needs. The same will happen with Lemmy and Kbin, and I hope with peertube and all the others. I keep saying it…the Fediverse is what we should have been doing all along, rather than tolerating the billionaires because it was “convenient”.

No specific quote, just a thought that Vimes has several times…If you’ll do something bad for a good reason, you’re that much closer to doing something bad for a bad reason.

In fairly short order, once I left Twitter for Mastodon, I became far more active than I ever had been on the birdsite. And already, I’ve found there is nothing on reddit that I was following that I can’t find with Lemmy. I suspect I’ll become a lot more involved here over time.

It’s not that the fediverse is a good replacement for twatter, Reddit, Facebook, etc…it’s what we all should have been doing all along. It’s like having old school usenet back.

Obscuring locations makes me feel better, but as you say, it means close to nothing. I wouldn’t bother.

I was asking myself the same question a couple of years ago, and there wasn’t any real need for either. I ended up making it a Winlink RMS which actually does get regular use.

I’m in :)

W6KME, Keith. CVARC (education Director, Field Day coordinator), VCARS (Secretary), VCARC (plain old regular ham). ARRL VE, instructor, ACS/ARES for Ventura County CA. Perpetual newbie and student. Co-founder and current manager of the BORED Net Group, which runs a daily VHF net, monthly µField Day (read “micro field day”), and annual Silent Key memorial, and some much larger events in planning. www.theborednet.net

STP felt that he himself was “discovering what happened” (a JRRT phrase) as he wrote, so I read them chronologically, in the same order the author did (so to speak.) There are a lot of other good options for reading order, and few bad ones, but that’s what I always tell people to do.