• Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    You don’t respond well at all… When asked for anything to defend your stance, you got bumpkiss nothing.

    • Prandom_returns
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve already “defended my stance” (debate lord lol), but you failed to comprehend it. So I’m not going chew it up for you. If you’re not smart to discern a good poll from a shit one, there’s not much thinking I can do for you.

      I’m sure you can find polls on facebook that will prove (to you) that 5G causes covid.

      • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I didn’t fail to comprehend anything. You claimed a poll was shitty… And have no alternative data. You can’t claim a poll is shitty without either providing evidence of a flaw (you didn’t) or having a better quality poll (you didn’t). You didn’t defend anything. You just claimed something with no source or evidence.

        When I asked you to provide EITHER piece you needed to substantiate your claim.

        I can, but you don’t seem to be genuinely interested, so I’m not going to waste my time.

        Which on the internet is effectively the same as you have nothing.

        I’m sure you can find polls on facebook that will prove (to you) that 5G causes covid.

        Wow, now I know you’re dumb. I don’t need polls in that case because science says otherwise. You know with actual studies. You don’t poll on facts, you poll on feelings or actions. However in this case we’re literally talking about how people feel and thus need polls. Now if your argument was how many people feel that 5G causes COVID… then yes. But that wouldn’t make you sound like a moron for making the comparison now wouldn’t it? You know… since it’s exactly the same premise.