THE BBC has been asked to explain why it has not reported on a large-scale anti-Brexit rally in the centre of London …

  • towerful@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    147
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Whilst the BBC is impartial and independent and whatever etc. Key positions have been packed with Tory Party supporters/donors/friends.
    It’s no surprise they toe the government line, especially for their fellow Tories

    • darq@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      94
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I feel like the BBC’s “aura” of impartiality makes it all the more dangerous when it does occasionally engage in propaganda. A lot of regular folks put a lot of trust in the BBC.

      • towerful@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        41
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yup.
        Similar to the “equal airtime” or “show both sides” when it comes to science.
        It puts unscientific opinions alongside scientific theory as if they are equal.

        The only thing I can say in favour of the BBC is that it seems like the majority of people feel it’s coverage is favourable to “the other side”.
        So, while we may be saying “BBC is clearly biased” because of things like this, I guarantee there are people that we don’t agree with saying exactly the same about other topics.
        So the situation is probably not as bad as it seems.

        It does seem the majority of these “scandals” are about the BBC acting in favour of the Westminster UK government. But maybe that just the ones I actually see.

        • darq@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          31
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m a little hesitant to put much stock in conservatives’ claims of bias, because plain factual reporting tends to strike a lot of them as biased. Reality is biased against modern conservatism.

          I don’t think the BBC is the worst by any means. But a couple of years ago, they did come out with one of the most egregiously misleading articles I’ve ever seen with regards to transgender people. Very obviously deliberate in its misinformation and even including proven lies about contacting sources. And to this day the BBC stands by it and has dismissed complaints.

          So yeah, worth being wary.

          • towerful@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Very good points.
            I just wanted to temper the discussion a bit, and just check that I wasn’t getting too carried away, echo-chambered or whatever.
            Having done that, I still agree with you. I don’t think the BBC is impartial or unbiased.

    • wewbull@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      It no longer is impartial. It just reports what it’s told.

      It’s not the job of a journalist to report that someone says it’s raining. They have to stick their head out of the window and check, and then report what they find. They have forgotten this and it’s shameful.

      • bpm@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        1 year ago

        Mostly hate and misery, with a good dash of racism.

        For a more serious answer, “tory” is the nickname for a member of the Conservative party, the UK’s major centre-right party. Much like in the US, they’ve been shifting further right in the past few decades and focusing more on “culture war” BS.

      • towerful@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        A Tory is the Conservative Party.
        They are to the right. Although, if it’s US politics you are used to they would probably be considered center or old-school right - not this new Right bullshit that’s prevalent these days

        • DominusOfMegadeus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          1 year ago

          So, their party revolves around thinly veiled plans to divert money to the rich, and tighten their control over the common people?

          • towerful@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Pretty much.
            Their whole deal is “fiscal responsibility”, which apparently means applying austerity for about a decade and cutting huge amounts of public service budgets.

            Mild tinfoil hat
            Things like the amazing NHS end up underfunded (and leveraged as a bargaining tool, like when Brexit would give the NHS 350m extra per week). Obviously waiting lists get longer, some people maybe start seeking private care for some things. Then the Tories can turn around and say “the NHS is broken, people are using private care, we should sell off the remaining NHS and do the American thing. Think of the tax cuts!”.
            /Mild tinfoil hat

            They also hate immigrants, want the old Rule Britannia/British Empire thing back, think dealing with climate change is untenable, a whole bunch of fun stuff like that.

            • palordrolap@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              Jeremy Hunt, current Chancellor of the Exchequer, literally co-authored a book on how to dismantle the NHS and replace it with a health-insurance based system.

              He was Secretary for Health at one point too, and his policies didn’t exactly rule out that he might be following the game-plan of that book.

              There’s no tinfoil hat needed here. The Tories are all but open about what they’re doing at this point.

              • towerful@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                There’s no tinfoil hat needed here. The Tories are all but open about what they’re doing at this point.

                I know, but a part of me has to believe that the government is working for the benefit of all it’s citizens.
                Otherwise, what the fuck am I doing here? The future is bleak enough with hyper-consumerism, class/wealth gaps and climate change.

          • SoylentBlake
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Torys have been buying up the land that NHS hospitals are on and jacking up their rents

            …then railing on and on about the ever rising costs of health care

            Playing the long game until some crisis comes and then poof, welcome to the American Health* care system, you give us everything you own and we’ll give you 3 months to live. Maybe.

            And forget about dental and vision. That’s for rich people.

            Seriously Neoliberalism is anti-nationalist. The rich fucking despise regular people and do everything they can to, first, ensure that they are getting the government contracts, and then B, looting all that money, saying government doesn’t work and dismantling us back to fuedalism.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        The Tory are a nickname for the right-wing conservative party.

        Historically it has been used in a somewhat derogatory manner. If somebody is a Tory then they tend to engage in more right wing policies than a Conservative who tends to be more center-right. Although technically there’s no actual difference and they’re all the same party.

        Anyway they’ve lately started calling themselves Tory in a weird “let’s take the word back” way, so you can more or less now just use the two words interchangeably.

        Internally they have a lot of infighting about this, because some of the Backbenches (politicians who are members of the party but are not actually in government, think the equivalent of senators in the US) are unhappy with the parties direction because they feel that going full on lunatic right wing nut job might harm their chances of getting reelected. And based on current polling data it would seem that they are correct.

      • barsoap
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Having gone to Eton and therefore considering confidence vastly more important than competence, or, as a voter, falling for the pseudo-noble character traits that produces.

        The whole thing kinda worked out in imperial times up to about Thatcher who took away much power from the civil service so the Etonians aren’t handled by Sir Humphreys, any more, but the likes of Cambridge Anatytica.