• Dolores [love/loves]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    i guess i’m not really disputing the structure of development of land but the “amount of money they can charge us” from OP is governed by more than how much is built

    because it’s not just development/construction, it’s also rent which can be changed more readily than building new housing. unless all the rentiers are in on a cartel, there’s an incentive for gaining competitive advantage by undercutting the others

    • EnsignRedshirt [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      The market is generally good at setting the market price for rent, it’s just that the market price for rent is very high because people need shelter, the location of that shelter matters, and the supply of it at the location you want is limited. As long as rent is set by the market, it will be as high as people are willing to pay, and that price is very high. There’s no need for a cartel to overcharge people for rents. The cartel is land ownership. It’s built into the system already without any coordination needed.

      What is required, as you said before, is decommodification of housing. If housing is no longer an investment vehicle, then its value can be determined by how people are using it.