• Moneo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Terrence sent his “paper” to NDT. Idk whether or not he was requesting a peer review but he spouts this stuff publicly constantly, he can’t be upset that people are refuting him publicly.

    • danc4498@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’m not saying Terrence has any legs to stand on, he doesn’t.

      I’m just saying it seems a little douchey to get a paper from someone that is in no way a colleague or friend and go to town on that paper. He should have treated it like an amateur that needs encouragement not a colleague that needs the hard truth.

      • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        He should have treated it like an amateur that needs encouragement not a colleague that needs the hard truth.

        There is no way of saying “your fundamental method of understanding the world is faulty” in a way that someone won’t describe as “douchey”.

        • danc4498@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          So we’re in agreement that what he did was douchey.

          There’s many things he could have done that weren’t douchey.

            • danc4498@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              There’s a wide range of reactions that are not douchey while being both honest and on topic.

                • danc4498@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Rather than giving an entire unsolicited peer review, I would just mention there were issues with the paper and offer a full peer review if he’s interested. It’s clear from the paper that Terence has no idea what the process of a peer review is, so maybe start by educating him on that.

                  Now, if that happened, or if Terrence sent the paper and asked for a full peer review, I would take back my comment. But based on this video, it didn’t feel like that’s what happened.

                  • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    Talking about it hypothetically is a cop out.

                    It’s clear from the paper that Terence has no idea what the process of a peer review is, so maybe start by educating him on that.

                    By assuming he doesn’t know what peer review is (something anyone can google) you have guaranteed that someone will find your response douchey. By not giving a peer review you have also been dismissive.