Also, I don’t just mean they are reactionary in certain area or in their personal life (Like Aristotle was important for biology despite being an apologies for slavery)?

I mean worth looking into their thinking precisely in areas where they’re reactionary.

Possible suggestions (not saying they’re justified) that I expect people would put forward include:

  • Carl Scmitt
  • Heidegger
  • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I enjoyed Mishima Yukio when I was younger, almost as a morbid fascination/character study. As a non-western nationalist, he wasn’t happy with American hegemony/occupation, including the use of Japan as a staging ground for the Korean War (“It was supposed to be our turn to bomb Korea”). Unlike the American conservatives I was used to, he had an actual culture to write about, so he could write florid prose about some aspect of Japanese culture and talk about how it’s being destroyed by neoliberalism and it’s a little bit more reasonable than the things the American right whines about (though it’s important to remember that his cause was abhorrent and fascist).

    A lot of his writing subverted my expectations of what the right could look like - though I encountered him before the Alt-Right was a thing. In some ways, I feel like he prepared me for the Alt-right. He was all about the Chad meme and bodybuilding and strong muscular men, he was (most likely) gay, and in one of his novels the protagonist cucks the imperial prince (despite Mishima’s affection for imperial rule). A lot of the Milo Yiannopoulos-type bits and subversiveness and attempts at third-positionism were kinda like :seen-this-one: