• UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      Even in the short-term, mass incarceration is - at best - a loss leader. And if you look at what’s happening in the UK right now, even their police and prisons are getting cannibalized by a government intent on gutting every conceivable public service.

      They’re farther along the death spiral than we are, but we’re all headed in the same direction.

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 months ago

        You’re missing a critical point. The cost of housing the inmates is borne by the taxpayers. The profit from the labor is reaped by the corporations. It doesn’t matter how inefficient it is, all the costs are borne by taxpayers, so it’s perfect for businesses.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          The cost of housing the inmates is borne by the taxpayers.

          The cost of housing prisoners is far higher than the cost of housing the homeless. And it isn’t as though incarcerated people weren’t employed prior to arrest.

          Moving a farm worker or a retail clerk to a chain gang isn’t economically efficient even discounting the moral atrocity.

          It doesn’t matter how inefficient it is.

          It matters immensely. And you can see it in the sector growth of states with high incarceration rates.

          The motivations behind this policy aren’t purely economic. A lot of it just boils down to fascist bigotry.

          The cruelty isn’t a means to an end. It is the end itself.

      • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        The major “desired” impact, I suspect, is not in direct profits from the slave labor but in the wage suppression that it causes outside of the prison population.