• ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    6 months ago

    Because causing division/voter apathy when facing a threat to democracy is a terrible idea

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Democracy is perfectly fine until my candidate loses, at which point democracy is dead until late September when mid-terms start ramping up, and then suddenly democracy works again and we need to get ready to vote in 2026.

        • distractionfactory@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 months ago

          Democracy is perfectly fine until the candidate that loses refuses to accept the results, tries to retain power by force, then continues to try undermine faith in democracy for 4 years and is somehow still the frontrunner for his party.

            • distractionfactory@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              6 months ago

              Gore’s VP (Joe)? I don’t remember all of the details, but that was legitimately a contested election by the numbers, not by a sore loser. Won the popular by a decent margin but lost the electoral. It was by a slim enough margin to trigger a recount. As far as contested elections go I thought that could have gone a whole lot worse.

              I’m not sure I get the comparison here.

              • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                6 months ago

                that was legitimately a contested election by the numbers

                Not according to the incoming Republican administration. There are still conservatives who flog that election to prove how little Democrats care about democracy.

                I’m not sure I get the comparison here.

                If Gore had squeaked out a win even in the face of abundant ratfvckery in Florida and Ohio, Republicans would have insisted the election was a fraud in the same way they insisted Clinton stole the election in 1992 and Carter in 1976 and Kennedy stole it in 1960.

                Because this is a partisan issue, there’s no real clean line between legitimate victory and election theft from the perspective of the partisans themselves. And because both sides routinely fight dirty (Nixon was as aggressive fucking democrats in southern Illinois as Kennedy was in fucking Republicans in Chicago), it is often difficult to talk about a clean race when the reality is more often that one person or the other lost in a dirty knife fight.

      • Ilikecheese
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        It’s not though. Even though we’d prefer a different candidate, everyone who isn’t a complete moron has at least agreed that we’re gonna stick with Biden because he’s better than the alternative and it’s not even close.