I made a blog post discussing my biggest issues with Lemmy and why I am kind of done with it as a software.

  • Norah - She/They@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Do you mean disabling downvotes? That’s how it is on Blahaj. It definitely makes a difference to the amount of toxicity I think.

    • Exocrinous
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      On Blahaj reports are the only way to express disapproval of content. So you could for example spread fascist dogwhistles about not liking politics, and if Ada doesn’t understand the dogwhistle then your content doesn’t get removed. That gives cryptofascists free reign

      • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’ve seen quotes directly lifted from fascist works upvoted by hundreds on Beehaw. The problem with only-positive user feedback is that as long as it seems like a positive statement that others support people will often grant it further support without thinking about what is actually being said.

        Or at least that’s what I hope was happening.

          • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            Would that actually violate the guidelines? This was around all the time of the defederation drama, so ages ago in internet time, and I recall looking at the guidelines and thinking “Well this isn’t a bad faith argument, and it’s not technically hateful unless you know where it leads.”

    • Feydaikin@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      Nah, there doesn’t seem to be a problem simply writing nasty comments. Personally I’d prefer getting downvoted to hell than a ‘pile-on’ in the comments spewing bile.