Been awhile since we’ve done this thread, and it’s always fun. Here are some of my picks:

  • The Pursuit of Happyness (2006) is really bad. Will Smith’s inspirational moment is going to the New York Stock Exchange and seeing all the happy rich guys in suits walking around, and wanting to be like them. Having to do stuff like brown-nose executives, sleep in train station bathrooms and pull his son out of daycare due to lack of money are presented not as flaws of the system but evidence of Smith’s smart bootstraps-oriented thinking. This movie is the Mein Kampf of liberalism.

  • Air (2023) is really bad too. Literally a feature-length Nike commercial coupled with a fuckton of Michael Jordan worship, the message being that a bunch of rich guys deserved to get even richer because they signed a sneaker deal. The closing 5 minutes of the movie are a “where are they now” montage showing how much money all the Nike executives made, yay!

  • Anastasia (1997), which portrays the Russian Revolution as the result of a wizard’s curse and communism as bad because it got in the way of the Romanovs living in big palaces and wearing fancy dresses.

  • The Post (2017), about a wealthy, heroic girlboss newspaper executive who makes the heroic decision to…uhh…not block the publication of a story that would expose the lies of a corrupt president threatening our democracy (take THAT drumpf)

post more.

  • homhom9000 [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    The hate you give(2018). The book wasn’t radical or anything but the movie pretended everyone’s protest against police violence is the same as protest against gangs, therefore getring rid of the one big bad guy gang leader is the same as justice.

    • axont [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      i just got whiplash after reading an angry fascist nerd complaining about how The Emoji Movie is too woke to presumably the same nerd reviewing The End of Evangelion

      there isn’t even an explanation for why the End of Evangelion is liberal. It just says Shinji fails his boss and masturbates

      • RyanGosling [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        There used to be an entry on there for American Psycho, saying that “despite” that title having American in it, it was anti-capitalist which is anti-american.

  • BelieveRevolt [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    The American President. I didn’t even realize until recently that this was written by Aaron Sorkin, but it makes sense, it’s an early example of exactly his brand of hokey bullshit.

    Whatever that movie was about Scooter Libby and the revealing of the CIA agent’s name that was all ”How dare Bush and Cheney treat one of our CIA heroes like that!”, they mentioned it on the first season of Blowback.

    • Vncredleader@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I do love Redford for this though. He had shopped his script about a widower president around for a decade. Man just wanted to see that dumb idea on screen

    • NPa [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      “In later interviews, writer Aaron Sorkin told TV Guide he wrote the screenplay while high on crack cocaine while he was living at the Four Seasons Hotel in Los Angeles, which is why it took him three years to complete it.[10]”

    • dead [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      The Iron Man 1&2 movies were funded by the USDoD after all. Most Hollywood movies that have military equipment or military bases in them are funded by the USDoD. The USDoD gives studios access to military equipment and military bases in exchange for allowing the USDoD to have creative control over the film.

      In this short video the role of the DOD in making Iron Man more visually spectacular is referred to by the Air Force Entertainment Liaison Project Officer Capt. Bryon McGarry, who talks of their aircraft as ‘production value’. One of the producers Jeremy Latcham spoke of how impressed he was by the sheer amount of military hardware in some shots, estimating it was worth ‘a billion and a half dollars’. These comments suggest that the DOD knows that it has the ability to add extra production value to movies that no one else can provide, and thus it places them in a position not just to influence scripts, but to influence which movies become the biggest blockbuster hits. Thus they have some control not just over individual films but over the shape of the entire Hollywood industry.

      https://www.spyculture.com/pentagon-production-assistance-agreements-iron-man-12/

    • zed_proclaimer [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      downbear

      You misinterpreted the entire meaning if you think this. The “poor” sub-basement family of conmen were fascist class traitors who betrayed the actually poor basement dwellers who worked hard and were in debt, and they got their comeuppance and a mutual destruction of the rich and poor classes instead of a successful revolution. It’s a story of class betrayal, the dangers of lacking solidarity and the futility of selfish behavior to climb the ladder. A warning and fable based in Marxist framing. The central magical macguffin, the rock, symbolized class mobility as it was given by an upper class friend to the main character at the same time he gave him a job offer and foot in the door for upward movement. That rock then was his own downfall as he tried to use it to murder a fellow proletariat to secure his position as a lackey of the rich, fumbled it, then was violently smashed by it used against him. Then he had permanent brain damage freezing him in a deluded mindset of upward mobility.

      It should also be considered in it’s uniquely South Korean context, the director was not that subtle about the basement family being DPRK. There was a whole scene about it. This entire movie is a reflection on the South Korean left’s failure to fulfill reunification, and predicting an upcoming mutual destruction. The housekeeper even begs the mother as a sister, as a fellow worker, to not report her and her husband for hiding in the basement. In response, the mother turns to call the police and turn them in. This is the main moment of failure, the betrayal. The other was getting her and the driver fired and using allergens on her and gaslighting the housekeeper of course, that’s the Korean War (biological weapons and class/national treason from the South Koreans, the main characters of the film and the intended audience). This is the turning point of everything, and it also represents the missed opportunity to reunify and go socialist afterwards by uniting against the rich family to usurp them together.

      If you don’t believe all this is intended, Bong Joon Ho’s other films are allegories of revolution where the back of the train kills there way to the front of the train - and The Host, a horror movie where the repugnant monster represents American occupation. Neither are nearly as subtle as Parasite, they’re much more on the nose. In South Korea it’s illegal to express any positive opinion on DPRK directly, so this sort of allegorical indirect message is the farthest one can go.

    • TheLastHero [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      came here to say this one, especially when Thaddeus Stevens’ “heroic moment” in that movie is him NOT saying black people are equal with white people to roaring applause and triumphant music. Like what the fuck were they thinking? It’s literally celebrating compromising scientific fact and your personal beliefs in the name of civility.

      • Red_Sunshine_Over_Florida [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I agree. I was cheering for Stevens confronting Lincoln on land reform when they argued in that scene about Reconstruction and then in the climax they brush aside his convictions with the same disdain that they had in 2012 whenever even people as lib as Bernie questioned the old orthodoxy. Just baffling.

    • BelieveRevolt [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I know that movie was a few years before Hamilton, but they definitely were part of the same ”look how great our nation’s diverse history is” Obama-era liberalism where the end goal was a ”we may disagree on some things, but we can agree on how great our nation is” statement jagoff

  • notthenameiwant [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    All the President’s Men is a celebration of liberal institutions. Especially now that we know “Deep Throat” was literally just the assistant director of the FBI who got snubbed for a job. Three Days of the Condor is a much better Redford conspiracy movie.

    • Vncredleader@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      All the President’s Men genuinely helped create the environment of modern US journalism. And for that it can burn in hell

      • zed_proclaimer [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        MIC stenographers? There’s no such thing as modern US journalism in the institutional “fifth estate” sense, just people who print the CIA memos handed to them

        • notthenameiwant [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          I’m currently reading through “A People’s History of the United States”, and none of the major papers would report on The Pike Committee (the uncensored, House version of the Church Committee). This is of course a few years removed from Watergate. “Journalism” in this country is shameful.