WolfdadCigarette@threads.net@sh.itjust.works to Greentext@sh.itjust.works · 8 months agoAnon goes apesh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square39fedilinkarrow-up1389arrow-down128
arrow-up1361arrow-down1imageAnon goes apesh.itjust.worksWolfdadCigarette@threads.net@sh.itjust.works to Greentext@sh.itjust.works · 8 months agomessage-square39fedilink
minus-squareJokklMaster@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up44arrow-down4·edit-28 months agoNo because this is classical operant conditioning not Pavlovian. Edit: Corrected for my stupid response while exhausted.
minus-squareRodeo@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up26·8 months agoPavlovian conditioning IS classical conditioning: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_conditioning
minus-squareDaefsdeda@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up15·8 months agoI think its like every pavlovian is a classical but not every classical is a pavlovian.
minus-squareJokklMaster@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·8 months agoThis is what happens when I’m posting while exhausted. It’s not Pavlovian/classical, it’s operant conditioning.
minus-squareExocrinouslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·8 months agoNo it’s not, it’s operant conditioning
No because this is
classicaloperant conditioning not Pavlovian.Edit: Corrected for my stupid response while exhausted.
Pavlovian conditioning IS classical conditioning: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_conditioning
I think its like every pavlovian is a classical but not every classical is a pavlovian.
This is what happens when I’m posting while exhausted. It’s not Pavlovian/classical, it’s operant conditioning.
No it’s not, it’s operant conditioning