• Zagorath@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    It’s important to note that the court has not actually (yet) found that Israel is committing genocide. It’s just said to Israel “hey, while this case is ongoing, make sure no genocides happen, k?” It’s more similar to a temporary injunction that a court might make against a company during a civil suit, because the court finds it plausible that they might end up needing to make a ruling against them.

    • iain@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      10 months ago

      And the court found it plausible that genocide is happening, which is what is needed for the process to continue.

      • Lost Subscriber
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        It’s a bunch of bullshit, and the fact that the articles about it completely ignore what’s going on just showcases that nobody has prepared themselves for the Holocaust II to happen with the Nazis carrying around Tiktok on phones.

    • Shyfer@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      They also didn’t throw out the case which is what Israel was asking for, so that’s good.

      • Lost Subscriber
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        It’s a bunch of bullshit, and the fact that the articles about it completely ignore what’s going on just showcases that nobody has prepared themselves for the Holocaust II to happen with the Nazis carrying around Tiktok on phones.

      • Lost Subscriber
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        This is about media criticism of the articles published during this time which all use overt misdirection to cover up the events taking place in court

        You’re the ones gassing yourself up over headlines existing.

        That’s all you little pseudointellectuals care about, as long as the Good Neutral Newspapers of Record have a headline about a thing, you think it isn’t omitting anything.

        You wouldn’t care about what is omitted after the headlines because they are a security blanket to you 🤡🎪🎪

          • Lost Subscriber
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            I’m dictating screaming into my phone half the time I will link to shit when I’m not doordashing and shit 🤷‍♂️

            I’ve seen them cover a thousand issues the same way to act as the left side of the overton window abs I’m sick to death of it

          • Lost Subscriber
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            10 months ago

            I will have a laptop and shit and be finished moving in a month then you are all really in for it on shitjustworks and dbzero and lemmy and lemmee hahahahh

    • Lost Subscriber
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Who gives a shit? This is about media criticism of the articles published during this time which all use overt misdirection to cover up the events taking place in court

      • Zagorath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Most of the articles I’ve seen have been making the same mistake I was trying to correct.

        • Lost Subscriber
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I forget to double back and explain this shit imma have to reply to a lot of ppl now haha