• Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Ah, because government-funded software is obviously safer. /s

    I bet, if they develop their own messager, they won’t make it open-source.

    • BrikoX@lemmy.zipOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m all for governments using taxpayer money to develop good software as long as they make it open source, sadly that’s rarely the case. Germany made some progress in that area, but that’s about it.

    • AnonStoleMyPants@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I bet the idea is that the data stays in France, and I fully understand and support this. Even if it is not open-source, but of course it would be preferable.

    • bouh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      When you are the said government, you obviously know who is spying the app you know.

    • BrikoX@lemmy.zipOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Matrix is not the best encrypted messenger, it’s more focused around public groups with E2EE being an optional feature as that doesn’t work with most bridges, which is the selling feature of Matrix.

        • BrikoX@lemmy.zipOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes and yes. But Matrix falls under the same group as WhatsApp and Signal, it’s UK not French based.

          • 520@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            However, Matrix as a service isn’t reliant on a parent company’s servers like WhatsApp and Signal are.