• Lou-Piccone89@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The automatic first down penalties need to be abolished,

      League bails out certain teams in the 4th quarter every week .

      • JWat87@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There isn’t an equivalent for the defensive side… like, imagine offensive holding meant 5 yard penalty and automatic 4th down.

        It’s demoralizing and game changing

      • SSPeteCarroll@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Every. Single. Week.

        Crucial drives that are in a 3rd down for certain teams always get a defensive holding, illegal contact, or a very late thrown PI flag that gives an automatic first down, which then changes the outcome of the game.

      • Zoollio@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        They should change some penalties so they give yardage but don’t change the distance for a first down.

        For example let’s say it’s, 3rd and 5 at the 50 and the defense gets an encroachment penalty. Normally it’d be a first down, what I’m suggesting is that it stays 3rd and 5, but now at the 45 yard line.

        • fatguysrsneaky@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t think that is the fix. I think the biggest fix is bailing out bad offense with a penalty. An under thrown deep ball to a sprinting wideout is the most common. Qb throws a bad pass defender plays it perfect if it was a good pass. But it wasn’t so they get a massive penalty. In those situations they need to change the rule to account for officials discretionary rulings of uncatchable. If a ball is thrown behind a receiver sprinting full speed with a db and he suddenly stops to try and catch bad ball it shouldn’t be dbs fault.

          • LbSiO2@alien.topB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Exactly, When a CB has blocked out a WR from the ball that is the WRs problem. This coming back thru the CB for a penalty is BS.

        • YeahThisIsMyNewAcct@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re getting downvoted but you’re completely right. Most defensive penalties that occur prior to or after to a play should move you further up the field without changing the yards to go.

        • Polterghost@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s a reasonable take. Even though there would be some drawbacks to your proposal, I really don’t understand why everyone downvoted you.

  • jawknee530i@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I disagree. I don’t care if every game ends 10-6 I’m interested in actual play not fake bullshit to pump numbers up.

    • 0xym0r0n@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Honestly the NFL doesn’t really care about us too much, I bet. We’re here talking about football in an online forum minutes before football is on. They already got us.

  • Korscade@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It is still irritating though. It really does seem like Micah gets held on every single play. Like… multiple literal chokeholds a game…

    • pickleparty16@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is every good pass rusher on every team. And every person who bitches about it roots for a team who’s OL holds non stop

    • t-pat@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The plays that look like chokeholds are usually not actually holding. You get to that position usually when the pass rusher does a rip move, which basically pushes the O-lineman’s arm up into a position where they have to either disengage or wrap their arm around the pass rusher. There’s an exception in the rulebook for those plays.

    • Fsharp7sharp9@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You could point to all the great pass rushers, I see it all the time against JJ and Q on the Jets because I watch them more, but you also see it constantly against Crosby, Hutch, Watt, Garrett, Bosa…

      Feels like the inconsistency just removes the advantage of having great pass rushers. That is a literal game changer for the Jets because you know damn well the Offense isn’t gonna do anything, so to see your DL getting mugged just makes it, like you said, irritating.

  • Quirky_Scratch_1755@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Its also boring when shit offensive play gets bailed out late with some grab ass PI call that was allowed throughout the entire game

    • BoysenberryToast@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh, you mean every 4th quarter during chiefs games? That’s their best play for converting a crucial 3rd and long!

      • flakAttack510@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        We’re actually below league average on the number of PIs called on our opponents. You generally have to pass downfield to get PI flags and Canada doesn’t stand for that nonsense.

    • BrotherMouzone3@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Offensive holding is the worst.

      It can be called on every snap…so the refs can use it to control the flow of a game. Sometimes they swallow their whistles.

      Worst is when “Team A” is expected to win by a decent margin but it feels like the league wants a nail-biter. They’ll start calling holding on every big play Team A gets so that they stay in 3rd & long situations. Team B hangs in the game long enough to make it interesting. Refs will throw some random penalties at Team B later in the game to even up the flags.

      Team B gets a bunch of ticky tack calls and thinks the league conspired against them late in the game. Team A feels like they got a bunch of momentum killing calls early…and would have blown out Team B otherwise.

    • TheRoyaleShow@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Or defensive holding. Especially if it’s in a big game in a crucial situation that essentially ends an exciting game in the most boring way possible. Just as a hypothetical and I’m not still mad at all.

      • Fourwindsgone@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Me watching my $2 go down the drain after the gators let Florida state run one in at the end of the game last night

      • mysterious_whisperer@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Doesn’t Fanduel make the same money either way because they set the lines so that there is approximately equal money on either side? I really don’t know anything about the industry except for how my father explained bookies to me 40 years ago.

        • Nuclearsunburn@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          While I am no bookie either, I believe that when a line shifts, that’s the purpose of it, to encourage more money on the other side. If I had to guess, they make a lot of money off of people betting the over on player props and point totals because it just feels bad to root for an under.

        • teddilicious@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          No. Sportsbooks inflate the line and odds for favorites and popular teams, then rely on those teams not covering the inflated line and losing more than the odds would suggest.

            • mysterious_whisperer@alien.topB
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Exactly. If they don’t and 90% of the bets are on the popular team, then the book looses big when the popular team wins.

              It would be interesting to see a book be completely transparent about it and open the betting at even odds then move a point in the opposite direction every time the bets get off balance. Of course that would be annoying as a better deciding what to play only to have it constantly change.

            • teddilicious@alien.topB
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              The goal isn’t for the money to equal out on both teams. If they did that, they would have less total bets and make less money, because people like betting on favorites. The goal is to make as much money as possible by having as many people as possible bet on a slightly inflated favorite.

  • KnotSoSalty@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    OL holding should be officiated differently. More like penalties in basketball. The line gets a set number of allowed holds per half and after that each one is a called penalty.

    Yes that means they could hold more early on, but that would risk a higher likelihood of holding penalties in key moments at the end of halves when it’s more valuable.

    Say the number is 5 allowed per team per half. There are 35 offensive plays per team each half. So the OL can only “get away” with holding on 14% of them, which I think we can all agree is less than the percentage of holds teams currently get no-calls on.

    You could build in safeguards against abuses as well like; no exceptions under 2 minutes.

    This would also allow linemen to learn how the refs will be calling holding for that particular game.

    If this worked for OL Holding it could also work for PI.

    • Polar_Reflection@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      So 10 times a game (5 for both teams), we’re going to have the refs stop the game to announce a penalty that doesn’t count? I’m sorry, but that would be an already ad-filled viewing experience that much worse.

      • KnotSoSalty@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It wouldn’t be a flag until the allowed holds ran out. They’d either make a 5 second announcement or just tell the teams on the sideline.

      • HealthcareIsKillUs@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The NFL and NBA already share the fact that they are entertainment entities meant to make profits first, competitive sports leagues that are meant to find the best team second.

  • angryvet_@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    They should change the holding penalty to 5 yards instead of 10. Maybe they’d be inclined to call more holds consistently. 10 yards is a huge penalty to recover from.

  • freedomhighway@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    if you tend to see and talk negatives, this question isnt for you. If you enjoy exploring the world of imagination, heres a wild one for you

    what would playbooks look like, if there was no penalty for holding? Lines freeze each other out, then what?

    yes, this is strictly video game territory, just to imagine what would happen

    • Doobie_Howitzer@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Outside runs, lots of draws and late developing play actions off of them. Another feature would be that you can run or pass out of any situation because the lines not moving means no illegal man down field.

      Defensively the slot blitz would be the best play in football

  • CoyoteHP@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The whole “refs would be throwing flags the whole game” comment is so nearsighted. Maybe that would happen a few games, but 10 yard penalties are absolute drive killers, call enough of those and offensive linemen will begin not relying on refs to overlook holds.

    • Nentendo63@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Usually it seems like the most egregious holds happen when the OL gets beat so bad they are trying to give the QB enough time to escape, if they actually stopped holding there’d probably be a lot more QB injuries. I think in the current state of the NFL, OL talent is outmatched by DL talent, and letting them get away with holding tips the scales a bit back so they’re more evenly matched.

      I agree it’s total bullshit though, either call it every time or make it legal. Deal with the consequences. Letting the refs influence the game whenever they feel like it is wrong.

    • jdlnghm@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The same goes in reverse for defenses too, obviously. Defensive holding and late PI calls are getting flagged randomly or at the will of the ref rather than every time… call it every time and watch how quickly players adjust and stop trying to get away with breaking the rules.

      • JesusKristo@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m going to say something controversial here: i think you’re both tapping into the idea that the refs just need to be consistent. Either call it or don’t, but do it the same way the whole time. You’d definitely hear fewer complaints about the officials if they just called things (or let things go) consistently.

        • jdlnghm@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Agreed 100%. I’d take calls being made consistently as a stepping stone to better officiating. But ideally they would call all penalties and force players to adjust/play within the rules rather than just be consistent with what they do or don’t call. But I’d still take consistency in games, and across different ref crews, over what we have currently without question.

        • hearo@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s intentionally put into the refs hands to keep the bookies happy. Refs work for vegas.

  • SmallCondition1468@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The problem isn’t that holding happens every play. Many don’t matter and hardly impact the play.

    The problem is that highly consequential and OBVIOUS holding getting ignored is what frustrates fans. Refs, specifically THE referee consistently miss (or ignore) play-changing holds several times a game.

    Same problem with other penalties being called. Very inconsistent.

  • Cakelord@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Pretty much when anyone complains about no calls for holding… it’s called professional cheating and linemen at almost every level are taught how to get away with it.

  • DosCuatro@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Coaches probably tell them to just hold since the refs aren’t consistent enough but I get what Micahs saying. Last week he got hit in the face mask 2 feet from the back official and they didn’t call it. Something like that would irk me too