Well, they don’t. I am on Linux and there is no point in arguing over “shoulds” unless you tell me that there is any other FOSS kernel that can support the hardware and software applications that I need.

The idea is not to have to talk with everyone in the circle, but to have enough people to create a long tail of niche interests.

Takahe is IMO the opposite of “single user software” . It shines when you want to host multiple users with multiple different domains and identities.

some bizarre reason

Help is sorely needed. if you create a match thread and add the #NFL tag, you’ll surely get some participation from the Mastodon crowd.

Right, but the problem with them is “bad usability”, which amounts to “friction”.

Like I said in the original comment, I kinda believe that things will get so bad that we will eventually have to accept that the internet can only be used if we use these tools, and that “the market” starts focusing on building the tools to lower these barriers of entry, instead of having their profits coming from Surveillance Capitalism.

requiring a proof of identity or tracking users is a privacy disaster and I’m sure many people (especially here) would outright refuse to give IDs to companies.

The Blockchain/web3/Cypherpunk crowd already developed solutions for that. ZK-proofs allow you to confirm one’s identity without having to reveal it to public and make it impossible to correlate with other proofs.

Add other things like reputation-based systems based on Web-Of-Trust, and we can go a long way to get rid of bots, or at least make them as harmless as email spam is nowadays.

Not even the biggest tech companies have an answer sadly…

They do have an answer: add friction. Add paywalls, require proof of identity, start using client-signed certificates which needs to be validated by a trusted party, etc.

Their problem is that these answers affect their bottom line.

I think (hope?) we actually get to the point where bots become so ubiquitous that the whole internet will become some type of Dark Forest and people will be forced to learn how to deal with technology properly.

Well, yes. But to me interesting part of the article is that I used to think that they did this to check if the venue was taking them seriously about general aspects of their rider, maybe to accommodate some of their eccentricities or to fuel their parties. I didn’t know that this was used as a canary test of the safety work, and I didn’t know that they were pushing for such large scale operations on their tours.

This is not a matter for instance admins but for proper community moderation.

Btw, it would be amazing to see @frameworkcomputer@fosstodon.org posting into this community. Let me know if you need any help to get interop between Lemmy and Mastodon.

If anyone from framework is listening to this: I’d be more than glad to give full control over this community to any of your social media staff

Yes, it is possible.

I am the instance admin, and I am asking you to check it precisely because I am trying to troubleshoot it…

My point is that we should take their current approach as a good thing.

I"m not saying that we should blindly trust them, but I am saying that if we want corporations to Do The Right Things, then it’s a lot better to let them have a seat at the table and participate with the community than to simply ostracize them forever because of their past wrongdoings.

Then I’d ask you to please check again your language settings, or talk with the admin of your instance. There really is no reason for it to be failing.

What happens if you try posting to the community? (I noticed now that my comments are only accepted if I let the language as “undetermined”)

Can you try unsubbing and trying again? I checked with people with multiple different instances and it seems to be working fine…

They don’t “need” the SWF. If Zuckerberg wanted to simply takeover the control of ActivityPub, they could just use their existing devrel people that work with the W3C and push the changes directly at the “authoritative” organization.

Can you subscribe to it just fine, or is it in “pending” state?

Language settings?

If you have examples of relays differentiating themselves based on moderation policies, it would be appreciated. Not just “we are extreme free speech holders” vs “we pay attention to some laws here”. What nostr relay is actually running a strict filter, or do any type of analysis on the message content beyond “payment only”?

as if instances have not gone down with users identities.

If instances go down, there are still lots of possible backups: someone can recover the domain name and regenerate keys (or even recover a database copy). If someone loses a private key, there is no turning back. The fact that (some) poorly managed system are not recoverable does not mean that it is as fragile as something as nostr that gives up completely on making it.

allowing users the ability to drive their own experiences.

The same can be achieved on ActivityPub, no new protocol is needed for that.

Also, this is not matter of individualism, but of UX. It’s “nice” when users have the ability to make decisions on their own, but it is terrible when they have to make all decisions on their own to get started.

The one thing that I have in mind is improving the reddit bot for match threads and adding real time score tracker and links to game highlights.

Not willing to make prominent displays of sailor’s links, but I could let the mods run a bot that sends DMs to users who ask a specific question.