• KatnissBot@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    By the rules listed in the article, it would appear that she’s allowed to play.

    If a team doesn’t want to take the field, they are free to forfeit the match. That’s how the sport works.

    So yeah, looks like it’s not a complex issue after all.

  • CDO_6@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    maybe dont let biological males compete in biological female sports. science deniers really need to get their heads checked.

  • Wide_Challenge3880@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    There should be an open category and a female category.

    As for the case of FtM then they would have to play in the open category as that would be the same as doping if they were to play in the female category

    • fernandotakai@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      There should be an open category and a female category.

      that’s how tons of sports work (like chess and… the NFL). and imho, it’s totally fair.

      in chess, for example, men dominate. but once in a while, you have someone like Judit Polgár.

  • Salty_Homework3400@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    How can someone with physical abilities of a man play in a womens division?

    The physical attribute of that player gives him/her huge advantage over others. Especially when womens football is relatively developing right now.

    • etan1122@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      People hated on him at the time but Joe rogan was big on this. Biological men were fighting women in MMA and beating the shit out of them.

  • Gorz_EOD@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    There should be at least 3 categories.

    Biological Males, Biological Females, Free for all (everyone can compete regardless of gender)OR they could have various trans categories the same way the special Olympics has different levels of handicap.

    • Nihilism101@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just make the male one open for all.

      That way mtf athletes can just compete vs men, they wouldn’t have an advantage then.

  • Bayff@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    As they should do, this bullshit needs to stop going on.

    Give them their own division and be done with it, it’s unfair for these women and is damaging the growth of the sport.

  • shinytotodile158@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    As a trans woman who plays recreational football for a womens/nonbinary inclusive club, cisgender women regularly outpace, outmuscle, outjump, and generally outplay me. It is exactly the same in the other contact sport I play.

    The divide is not as dramatic as it’s made out to be, and the assumption that every trans player is inherently better due to biology does a disservice to cis female athletes who are more than capable of competing equally. Nobody talks about how the only transfeminine weightlifter at the 2020 Olympics came last.

      • EkkoUnited@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ain’t that like them… The same people who will go on to never watch a women’s match either.

    • Comicksands@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Its fine at the recreational level, eg. pickup basketball or football. However these are athlete careers and women should have a fair opportunity at that. The men’s league should be renamed open and allow athletes for all genders, while women’s leagues should be kept bio women.

    • random_nickname43796@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m a cis guy who gets regularly outpaced during races by women. Don’t see why there should be a women’s category at all, the divide is not as dramatic as it’s made out to be

    • lanos13@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Maybe ur just shit at sport, because the divide is absolutely massive. I played for a completely average mens team, and at 16 we beat our counties female under 18 team so badly we completely flipped our team, putting our cb and keeper up top just to keep it remotely unembarassing

    • mikeydoc96@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      A lot of people forget that the reason women’s sports in general are behind is due to money and mysogyny. Women’s football wasn’t recognised by the FA until 1970 so it made it almost impossible for women to organise and play. They’ve had to start in 1970 where men started in 1860.

      • snowkarl@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Honestly it’s part of why it isn’t as popular as it could be but are you honestly saying that they’d be equal in popularity compared to the men if not for this?

        Why isn’t this the case in other countries then? England has by far the most popular womens football despite this, how come it’s not more popular in say Sweden, Germany, Spain etc?

    • RjcMan75@alien.top
      cake
      B
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Anecdotes don’t work in this context. If we look at the two biological genders, we see a clear distinction in which one displays a higher level of “traditional” athleticism.

  • deaniegee@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This reaaaally shouldn’t be a complex situation at all, if anything each gender should have their own category. Ie male,female or trans. But then the trans community is rediculously small, so I doubt that be able to have their own

    • Bigmomma_pump@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      A trans division doesn’t make any sense as you’d have the same exact biological problem with ftm playing mtfs. So clearly it isn’t fairness that you care about unless you just didn’t think about it

      • deaniegee@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        mhmm that’s a very valid point! I hadnt even looked at it from that way. And fairness is competing with your OWN biological gender. Unless it’s a mixed sport

    • comeatmefrank@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s a complex issue that doesn’t have 1 simple answer. You cant ban all trans women from women’s sport - what about people that began transitioning before puberty? It’s not exactly something that hasn’t been debated before, so the FA really need to already have some guidelines in place.

      What about women (like Caster Semenya) that have a naturally higher concentration of testosterone? The issue could fall down then on players essentially refusing to play because they think someone is trans.

  • Worried-Trip635@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is only a ‘complex issue’ because of the current social climate, biological men and women compete seperatly for obvious reasons. Just look at the mixed sex swimming relay in the Olympics as an example.