• lilcs420
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    What’s wrong with a Vasectomy. I had one. Didn’t want more kids.

    • n00b001@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      Banging whenever you want without worry about child support? That sounds like the woke agenda

      /s

    • hydrospanner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      The right is just all about more birth, remember?

      Nothing about the quality of life, health, education, security, or financial situation of the children in question or their parents, just want to keep the population pumping out future consumers and low wage laborers, whether they want to or not!

      • Fester
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        Whoever made this image probably thinks vasectomy is just a liberal word for castration.

    • ChihuahuaOfDoom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yep, we had 2, decided that was enough and since the pill messes with my wife’s hormones too much I took care of the problem on my end.

        • NABDad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          “Sir, we tried. We really did. We’ve gone through three shifts of surgical teams. We’re all too exhausted to continue. You’re going to have to schedule another procedure for the other testicle.”

          “Try not to look at the nurses. You’ve already impregnated three of them just by being in the same room.”

    • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Im glad someone else asked, I was wondering what’s so bad about unlimited worry-free creampies.

  • Leg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ll never not be fascinated by the things that make conservatives feel threatened (SpOokY SOy). There isn’t anything too provocative here, outside of the inherent 4chan dog whistles that I’d expect most people are pretty bored of by now. Let Batperson slay if they want to ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    • chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Like everything else, it’s just fragile masculinity. They heard soy has estrogen (it does, but not in the same form that would affect you), but lack the ability to verify facts or understand nuance, so they just assume soy feminizes a person. They take that as an attack on their manhood. Then they get stupid and violent… well… stupider.

  • CameronDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    1 year ago

    Batman does provide a safe space, thats his whole thing. He makes Gotham safer. And you could argue his reluctance for murder is almost non-violence.

  • LoamImprovement@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    Funded by Bill Gates

    Does the poster not know that Bruce is a billionaire? Do… Do they not know that Bruce Wayne and Batman are the same person?

  • Kusimulkku
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    Does anyone actually use the term “birthing person” or are they just fighting against windmills here

    • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s a term that’s been used by Healthcare advocates when talking specifically about prenatal care and abortion. It’s because it’s a, ya know, valuable term when women as a group includes those who can’t become pregnant and it also doesn’t include everyone who could become pregnant (transmen).

      And it’s specifically NOT a term to replace women. It’s a different group entirely.

  • sfcl33t@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’d read/watch the shit out of that, would be more interesting than 90% of the current superhero characters.

  • GarfieldYaoi [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Batman already beats up thugs, shouldn’t he already be cancelled for “emasculating” men? Hell, CHUDs would faint in horror if they ever had to deal with Frank Miller’s batman, who would flat out castrate them if crackers keep using “muh dick” as an excuse for acting like savages.

    • Tinidril@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Batman originally had no qualms about killing criminals or using guns. What changed? Conservative outrage in the 1950s led to congressional hearings and ultimately the “comics code” that forbade violence and even disrespect of the US government.

      • Kynuck97 [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Crimes shall never be presented in such a way as to create sympathy for the criminal, to promote distrust of the forces of law and justice, or to inspire others with a desire to imitate criminals.

        What a bunch of cowards holy shit