• aport@programming.dev
    391·
    1 year ago

    Fittingly, Fedora 39 arrives 20 years and 1 day after Fedora Core 1 was released November 6, 2003.

    Time really sneaks up on you doesn’t it

  • beta_tester@lemmy.ml
    293·
    1 year ago

    Everything in that article is GNOME related. Nothing is fedora 39 or linux 6.5 related

  • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.worldEnglish
    13·
    1 year ago

    I’m pretty sure Fedora Core 4 was my first Linux daily driver. I love distro hopping but I always end up back on Fedora when I have a big project to work on and I just want vanilla Gnome, my developer tools, and no surprises.

  • d3Xt3r@lemmy.nzM
    83·
    1 year ago

    Meh. As a KDE F38 user, this is a super boring release. Nothing really new for us to look forward to, except LibreOffice 7.6 (which you can get via Flatpak). I was hoping the new DNF 5 would make the cut, but guess it’s still not ready yet. :(

    Guess will have to hold out my excitement until F40 for Plasma 6 and DNF 5 (hopefully).

  • Sentau@feddit.de
    1·
    1 year ago

    Wasn’t fedora 38 already on linux 6.5. Why is that touted as feature of fedora 39¿?

    • buskbrand
      1·
      1 year ago

      Wonder what it would take for KDE to become the default Fedora DE.

      • carly™English
        2·
        1 year ago

        To preface, this is going off of my memory of a comment I read half a year ago, which I don’t fully understand the details of, so take it with a grain of salt.

        I recall reading one of the developers of the Fedora KDE Spin talking about how the reason a lot of distros don’t use KDE as their default has to do with how the various KDE components don’t all follow the same release cycle, making it difficult to structure a distro’s release cycle around it.