Only one item can be delivered at a time. It can’t weigh more than 5 pounds. It can’t be too big. It can’t be something breakable, since the drone drops it from 12 feet. The drones can’t fly when it is too hot or too windy or too rainy.

You need to be home to put out the landing target and to make sure that a porch pirate doesn’t make off with your item or that it doesn’t roll into the street (which happened once to Lord and Silverman). But your car can’t be in the driveway. Letting the drone land in the backyard would avoid some of these problems, but not if there are trees.

Amazon has also warned customers that drone delivery is unavailable during periods of high demand for drone delivery.

      • lipilee@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        And maybe that craft could have wheels instead of rotors to mitigate the rain/wind problems… i think we might be on to something here!

        • lud
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Haha, now I am picturing a huge Chinook delivering the smallest package of essentially bullshit to my door.

          Yeah, I am totally behind that idea.

      • UnspecificGravity@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The problem is that the bigger and heavier the craft the higher it’s minimum drop height is going to be because it’s more dangerous and needs more clearance.

        Obviously it also becomes much more costly to run.

          • Zevlen
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            That made me laugh… I was imagining a small parachute hooked up to a plasma TV 😲

      • histic@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        not even necessary a bigger capacity I mean it being just able to bring me like a bag of chips or something I forgot for dinner would be great

        • Fluke
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          While people will undoubtedly take the piss, for a number of reasons, it’s less energy expenditure / lower footprint than you getting in your car/truck and going to the store and getting them yourself.

          • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            If you factor in all the logistics and systems necessary to run the drone operations and all associated functions, is it likely to be much of a saving?

            I could see something like this as useful for medical prescription delivery, but that comes with its own issues and dangers.

            • GiveMemes@jlai.lu
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Yeah, almost definitely. Even if those systems have a relatively high power draw, they’re still not being powered by a low efficiency ice engine but are being powered by a grid that’s only getting greener. Also factor in the fact that a car+person is minimum about 1100kg that needs to be transported as opposed to the low weight items plus the weight of the drone (can’t be more than 2-3 kg)

          • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Would it be less energy expenditure than a delivery van making multiple stops on its way to deliver you your bag of chips?