This is kind of the anti-distro hopping thread. How long have you stayed on a single Linux distribution for your main PC? What about servers?

I’ve been on Debian on and off since 2021, but finally committed to the platform since April of this year.

Before that I was on OpenBSD from 2011 - 2021 for my desktop.

Prior to that, FreeBSD for many years, followed by a few years of distro-hopping various Linux distros (Slackware, Arch, Fedora, simplyMEPIS, and ZenWalk from memory).

How long have you been on your distribution? Do we have anybody here who has been on their current distro for more than a decade?

    • unix_joe@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wow, probably the winner. 25 years is really cool, such a long time for one distro.

      In 1998 I tried Red Hat 5.2, but then switched to Slackware, and ended up on FreeBSD since it was like a better Slackware. I must have been all of 12-13 years old.

      I admit I never even tried Debian until Lenny, and then went back to OpenBSD.

  • tristramr
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I stopped having time (or inclination) to mess around with multiple distributions after getting out of college and into real life. So… Since at least about 2002, with Debian.

    • unix_joe@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wow, more than 20 years on the same OS.

      I would have stayed with FreeBSD or OpenBSD but eventually my requirements outgrew what they could provide.

      Now I’m on Debian. You chose … wisely.

  • pascal
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I distro hopped a lot since installing a retail red hat box bought at the store in 199something.

    It’s now more than 10 years that I basically only run Debian (on all my servers) and Gentoo/funtoo (on my workstations). For my partner and relatives, I install only Mint because it lacks all the cool gadgets, but it’s stable as a rock, especially on notebooks, and still reminds them of Windows.

    I tried Arch, btw. Nice wiki, horrible package management.

    I tried Pop_OS, it’s fun, it’s fine, it’s fresh, but tends to self-destruct if I push it too much.

    I loved Elementary OS, it’s really promising but always gave me the feeling to run a beta OS.

    • illectrility@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree on pretty much all of this. I love Pop, so psyched for COSMIC DE. I now run it on all my machines (except for Raspberry Pi OS on my RasPis and EndeavourOS on my old PC).

      Package Management on Arch is not my cup of tea. But EndeavourOS is great for what I need it to do (make old PC feel like slightly less old PC).

      Mint is awesome. If I have to recommend a distro to someone who is not that knowledgeable, I give them Mint and a quick rundown on how it works. Mint is awesome.

      • pascal
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Can I suggest you DietPi for your Raspberries? It’s basically Debian, but it’s tweaked to not consume your SD card too much.

    • unix_joe@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sams Teach Yourself Linux in 24 hours. Christmas 1998. Red Hat Linux 5.2.

      I upgraded a struggling 486 from Windows 95 OSR2.1 to Red Hat and Afterstep, and never really looked back.

      • pascal
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Afterstep

        Oh man that was such a cool UI, the best clone of NeXTStep for Linux. But configuring the menus by hand was annoying. :)

    • michael@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, I was a distro hopper up until I tried Tumbleweed for the first time. Been using it for two years now, hopped around for a year prior.

    • Jure Repinc@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Couldn’t agree more. Probably because they have some automatic QA going on on their CI and if some package does something wrong that this QA catches the package does not get included into update until it passes. Also if there would be something that would go wrong you still have automatic BTRFS snapshots created before and after and update and a boot entry automatically added to GRUB so you could simply reboot into old working state in such an unfortunate case.

  • pinchcramp@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I started with Linux like many, I guess, by distro hopping. My first experience was with Knoppix in the late 2000s (because I didn’t know what a live CD was), then I tried OpenSuse, went on to Fedora (is SELinux still such a pain in the ass as it was back then?) and then to Kubuntu.

    If I remember correctly I switched to Arch some time after Plasma 4 came out. About 11 years ago. It was, back then, one of the only distributions that shipped the newest stock KDE that “just worked”. Actually that might be wrong, but I didn’t know what I was doing with Linux anyways and somehow I liked Arch enough to stay. I used it at home, for work (software development) and at college. And it serves me well in all those areas (minus some minor hiccups).

    It’s still fulfilling my needs but lately I’ve been flirting with NixOS. I might change my daily driver once I get a new laptop (still rocking a Thinkpad T430 from 2012 but it’s starting to show its age).

  • KelsonV@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    My main desktop has been upgraded continuously from RHL5 (no E) in ~1999 to Fedora 38 today.

    Well, almost continuously. I’ve done at least one fresh install, when I switched from 32-bit to 64-bit hardware.

    Edit: I have used a lot of other distros on other boxes, both physical and virtual - I’ve just stuck with Fedora on that one.

  • s_s@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    My one desktop is 5 years on Manjaro now.

    Before that I had Ubuntu for 8 years across several installs, although I also dual-booted Windows back then.

    But I’ve had a freeBSD file server for at least 20.

  • oldfart
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I used Kububtu between 2008 and around 2013, then got so fed up with KDE4 bugs I switched to Xubuntu, and am using that ever since.

    So that’s 10 or 15 years depending how you count.

    When I want to play, I start a VM, base OS needs to be rock solid.

    • unix_joe@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      KDE 4 really, really set the Linux desktop back for years, at a time where we could have made a strong push into the mainstream market.

      • oldfart
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, it looked really modern and was great when it worked, which wasn’t too often.

    • epyon22@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Been on kubunu since 2008 on LTS versions. Rock stable 99% apps support and most have a ppa. Other distros nowhere near as stable and no package repos. Flatpak is changing that and not a big fan of snap though. We will see what might break my streak.

      • oldfart
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        KDE4 was stable for you? You have hit the jackpot, then, for me it froze pretty regularly, I’ve had artifacts, and of course there was Akonadi with high cpu and disk use.

  • deliriousn0mad@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    openSUSE Tumbleweed since 2019, it never breaks and if you break it you can easily roll back. Yes, there are a lot of updates, but I have a secondary system that I upgrade only once every six months and it works like a charm!

      • Gatsby
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        What are the selling points on endeavour over Manjaro? Or endeavourOS over arch?

        I’ve been on Manjaro a hot minute, and if I were to switch, I think I’d just go to arch. But I don’t personally know anything about EndeavourOS

        • Spunky Monkey@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          EndeavourOS is more or less Arch with an installer. It uses the same repos has Arch, Manjaro has their own repos that they delay the packages update.

          I really don’t have data to prove it, but EndeavourOS seems to run smoother than Manjaro.

          But just use what works best for you.

          • Gatsby
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Oh okay for sure, so if i can install arch than in your opinion should I just use arch instead of Endeavour?

            • Spunky Monkey@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Sure, why not. I choose Endeavour at the time because I couldn’t be bothered (lmostly lack of time) with the installation and configuration of Arch. Now Arch comes with an install script, that takes care of that for you.

  • Nerdfest@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Been using Ubuntu, or more recently, Kubuntu since 2006. Not sure that counts as a distro change. Can’t say enough good things about KDE these days though.

    • unix_joe@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I remember trying and liking the last KDE with 3.5x around that time. There was a .deb to install the Kickoff menu from openSUSE. Solid, ruined by the 4.0 transition. Good times.

  • jerstopholes@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    About two years, running Manjaro KDE. Runners up are Linux Mint, every major flavor of Ubuntu, and I briefly tried elementary OS. Manjaro has been my favorite for a while now!