I watched it recently for the first time, and I really don’t get why it’s so loved. IMDB rates it as the second-best movie of all time, but it seems far worse than that to me. I like most old movies and see their hype, but The Godfather didn’t do it for me. What am I missing?

  • redballooon
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    And that explains why it was impactful movies in the 70s, but that doesn’t explain why it’s rated 2nd best movie today. If anything you provided arguments against that.

    • dustyData@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because things can be appreciated for their historical relevance. It’s like saying that the Sputnik should be forgotten because SpaceX launches 20 satellites with a single rocket every other month. Or that Michelangelo statues are overrated now that we invented 3D printing.

      • redballooon
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        But again, for all it’s historical relevance, nobody rates Sputik second best satellite today.

        • sartalon@futurology.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          But I would still rate Michaelangelo’s David as the best sculpture today.

          Edit… Winged Victory though… looking up at it from the base of the stairs…

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s rated highly because the people who do the ratings are familiar with how impactful the movie was. They understand the quality of the film within the context where and when it was created.

      If you were to compare a Manet to an AI generated photorealistic version of the same painting, an art buff would prefer the Manet. Someone who lacks the context and background might complain about the brush strokes or the imperfect color blending or the lack of definition in the faces, and say that the AI generated image is “better.” That preference does not in any way diminish the quality of Manet’s work or the appreciation people have for it.

      When discussing art, “best” is always subjective. You’re allowed to not like the Godfather. It’s not my favorite movie, either, but I enjoy watching it now and again. People who love the film have written many books on why it’s their favorite masterpiece. You won’t win an argument with them that it’s not among the best movies of all time, but then neither will they convince you to appreciate the movie if you didn’t enjoy watching it.

    • beefcat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      not everybody who uses IMDB was born after 9/11.

      this isn’t a dig at gen-z for being “uncultured” or whatever, just pointing out that a substantial chunk of the population was able to experience the film before it became as “cliche” as it is today.

    • SRo@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s still better than 99% of all movies made in the last 30 years; you just have shit taste.