You know what else pisses people off: the fact that speeding kills 33 Americans every day and permanently disables dozens more.[1]
You know what else pisses people off: the fact that speeding kills 33 Americans every day and permanently disables dozens more.[1]
The downvotes on this comment are a testament to the privilege of drivers. It’s crazy how good people, who would otherwise not break the law, believe it’s their right to speed. And before someone tells me it’s a victimless crime I’ll remind everyone that speeding kills both those inside and outside of your car.
Two facts:
Followed by a hyperlink to the page for cunt
I don’t know, if I were surprised by a panther I think I would also be shocked and say holy shit, haha. How should I react to not get hirt?
Ellipses… definitely.
Sentences ending a full stop. Somewhat.
Very context dependent though
i.e. as “in effect” is even easier
I as pro-EV as the best of them. A cradle to grave emissions drop of 40% is a great step forward on reducing transport emissions (public transport and active transportation are a whole other aspect of this we’ll avoid here). However, characterizing the energy gap for EV charging as a non-issue is disingenuous.
You’ve correctly pointed out that peak hours are when the grid is most strained and vulnerable. Well, if most everyone who drives to work starts charging their EV when they get home from work, that is at the highest peak of the day: around 5-7pm. It’s the addition to the peak curve that’s the real concern. In most places, that means triggering on fossil fuel burning facilities to meet that peak demand. It also means increased peak loads on the transmission infrastructure that could overwhelm it.
That being said, there are some simple solutions: e.g. charge EVs on off-peak hours, smoothing out the demand on the grid. Where I live there is already an incentive to charge overnight in the form of ultra low overnight rates. I’m sure we’ll find the solutions, but please don’t pretend it’s not a problem.
The answer to why is billions of dollars of subsidies to the animal meat industry.
Yes it affects parts too, at least batteries. Stifling electric car production isn’t enough, ebikes get caught in the crossfire too.
No, the building on that land is assessed for value and property tax is levied based on that assessment. This is how it works throughout Canada/the US.
Reminder to remove the ?si= and everything after in your youtube links. It’s a tracker uniquely tied to you and your watch history and the links work fine without it.
Just a heads up, the ?si=… part of the youtube url is a tracker linked to you and your youtube history. Youtube will recommend people who click your link other things you watch. The ? and everything afterward can be safely removed and the link will still work.
Luo Ji isn’t even introduced until book 2. Season 1 is only book 1. I hate D&D for what they did go GOT as much as anyone else, but find something real to critique.
Where is this the case? Unimaginable here in Canada.
As with most sci-fi the author gets loopier in the later books. That being said:
I have definitely had this experience in KSP and never really thought about until this comment. Neat!
However, there is a practical reason the Apollo mission orbited on its side like this. The side of the spacecraft facing the sun would get very hot while the side facing away would get very cold. So the spacecraft would roll slowly as it travelled for passive thermal control. They literally callrd it the barbecue roll.
Orbiting a planet along it’s equator means orienting north/south (normal/antinormal) for a natural roll axis. Neat stuff!
Yeah that topology is probably better described as burrito
It’s the last equation j(x) that’s wrong. What’s plotted on the right is something like 0.2x+1.6
Your graphing calculator is more than capable of plotting linear functions just as well as desmos.
Survivorship bias?