The problem is that others aren’t likely to be more electable
The problem is that I don’t think the odds are appreciably better with any other Democrat.
Population is likely to peak within a few decades, and is already declining in the EU, China, and US. The issue here is that we are going to have a choice between lots of beef for the rich, and feeding everybody.
It’s on us to change political outcomes. That means not just voting but taking active steps to change who wins elections, such as volunteering
I don’t for a moment believe that the ruling would in any way protect a Democrat
The idea is to create a situation where it gets tied up in lower courts until after Trump is inaugurated again, at which point, everything Trump does is an official act, and he can’t be held responsible for anything, while also leaving room fro the courts to hold Biden and future Democrats responsible for innocuous acts.
Except that he’s not a Republican, so the royal perogative isn’t allowed by the courts
Several of those are direct translations of places that Americans immigrated from
No paywall, just registration. Use a throwaway email
Registration wall, not money
Trump substantially closed the funding gap
The outcome of the election is very much in doubt, and the reality is that Trump could win and put in place his dream of a thousand years of rich rapists
They were asked, and Trump just gave blather which didn’t respond to the question. Biden responded to his blather
And here I was thinking “crime” in public surveys meant “I see people with darker skin than me sometimes” rather than any kind of actual criminal behavior.
Not entirely though actually getting anything past the courts is going to mean something like expanding the court to disempower the Republicans there.
That’s probably become increasingly untenable. So he just responds with nonsense instead of a meaningful answer.
Yes, once the anti-vax anti-mask folks got their footing, it was pretty much guaranteed that we’d see a lot of deaths.
But what does “has to” mean anyways? The reality is motivated judge can rule pretty much anything as “ambiguous”
The debate has had a remarkably slight impact on public opinion to date. It’s not clear that it’ll shift things in any kind of meaningful way.
Getting something done means having enough Democrats in the Senate who want to change the rules. That’s a tough lift
Replacing Biden with a white man and making it unlikely that Harris would end up as President is a recipe for breaking the Democratic coalition. Probably not a good move.