The issue here is that marking articles like these as NSFW perpetuates the core issue of the content discussed: that this is a woman problem that should be talked about in private.
I guess that’s where the majority of downvotes come from as well: “this should not be viewed in the workplace” is a catastrophic signal in this context for the message.
yeaaa I can totally see where my request would be problematic to say the least
All of this is my personal opinion of course but I wanted to leave you with more than just a two word comment!
Yup and Thank you!🤗
based on your and other commentors I feel like I have a better grasp on future moderation decisions
for today, I def fucked up so this is a learning momement for me
again thank you for commenting!🤗🌻
As stated, images are reasonable to blur, because having them in your screen would Not be Safe For Work. Text generally doesn’t really make sense to blur, especially an article published by a major news source. If it could be seen in print sitting on a lobby coffee table, it probably doesn’t qualify as NSFW.
yup, I agree with all of your points
Text generally doesn’t really make sense to blur, especially an article published by a major news source.
also while rereading this I realized that I’m not really sure what the mainstream concensus decision is when it comes to NSFW text-based content
so maybe it’s fine?🤔? not too sure
ahhh ok honestly can understand that
thank you for commenting!
The line is crossed when the purpose of the material is to titillate.
this’ll help me figure out what does and doesn’t cross the line🤗
?
apologies but I don’t understand,
the post is still viewable
maybe the norm has changed for what’s NSFW and what’s not NSFW?
edit:
after thinking about this some more I feel like I need more thoughts from people to figure out what’s the right decision, trying to figure out content moderation is hard as I’m not perfect at this (I’m just a volunteer with no formal training)
please mark as NSFW🤗
marking your posts means to repect fellow users in their choice for disabling/hiding NSFW related posts
by respecting each other’s choices we’ll be able to garner more respect from the mainstream public and potentially gain new users to fediverse alternatives
edit:
I was in the wrong for this decision
thanks to @sushibowl@feddit.nl, @Scipitie@lemmy.dbzer0.com, and @agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works down in the comment chain, I’ll know what to do in similar future situations
how is IBM of all companies so progressive in terms of donations but is extremely shortsighted when it comes to user/customer support???
I REALLY didn’t expect an 89% from IBM
I think my workplace would be more concerned about the fact that their own sex toy shopping is tracked than the fact that I use sex toys.
fair enough
But I marked it as NSFW anyway.
Thank you!
dude it’s literally about sex toys
if you can view this at work I gotta say your workplace is pretty awesome/progressive than most places
I can’t stop laughing at how awful this looks😂
gives me Lynchian vibes
fuck yeah✊
if you wouldn’t mind,
please mark as NSFW~
depending on where the owner lives/resides they might be able to take this to court now for vendor lock-in/right to repair violations
thank you for introducing this into my life
didn’t realize I needed big bees until now❤️
if you wouldn’t mind
Please mark as NSFW🤗
ditto😆
Intel really set themselves up for a perfect memefest😂
oh hey Angela Collier! I loved watching her “A Scary Science video”
dope👌✨
If I recall correctly, Canada got rid of carrier lock-in several years ago
this is such a weird situation that I’m pretty sure that the court would also agree with her as most people (including me) wouldn’t know about the vehicle classification let alone knowing that electric ridable suitcases are a thing
anyways thanks for sharing this interesting/funny post!
ehhh I dunno
feels like I just made a fool out of myself in public😬
much appreciated🤗