Well, he’s definitely fucking around and ig we’ll all find out.
I make art that’s totally mine because I did it through AI. https://imgur.com/a/Rhgi0OC
Well, he’s definitely fucking around and ig we’ll all find out.
Isn’t this far worse to claim? Buying votes is illegal but so is claiming to have a lottery with no winners? I don’t understand how he has bad lawyers too. Am I missing something?
That is an amazing answer, I wish I could sticky it to the top.
A good compromise might be to list the MSN link in the comments (*if you want to). That way, we won’t double post and as you said, they get paid.
We still have to fight for him to be held accountable.
.Thanks for asking, I wasn’t trying to be shitty about it. I think we should post the original since most people on Lemmy are familiar with archive.is if they really want to read it. It has the bonus of making it easier if things are being double posted as well since you’re great at posting. I’ve had to catch myself double posting a few times, lol.
👀 Uhhh, there’s audio in this article: https://www.mediaite.com/tv/trump-trashes-ex-supporter-mark-cuban-as-insecure-and-weak-over-intelligent-women-comment-couldnt-take-his-calls-anymore/
Hey guys, it seems like this is getting kind of rage bait and/or full of misinformation. I’m going to lock it since it’s been up a while.
Here is the ad: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FaCPck2qDhk
There was a report about this publication. This publication is absolutely legit:
Professor Richard L. Hasen is an internationally recognized expert in election law and campaign finance regulation, writing as well in the areas of legislation and statutory interpretation, remedies, and torts. He is co-author of leading casebooks in election law and remedies. Hasen served in 2020 as a CNN Election Law Analyst. He directs UCLA Law’s Safeguarding Democracy Project…. Read full bio on the UCLA Law website.
Spooooky.
We’re now playing the billionairre game vs the US government. I bet I know who wins.
- Elon Musk ignores legal drama and continues his $1m giveaway
- Musk didn’t show after trying to get giveaway case moved to federal court - Philadelphia prosecutors
https://www.bbc.com/news/live/cx2n4l79dn7t
Edit: I was right.
Pennsylvania judge puts challenge of Elon Musk’s $1M-a-day voter sweepstakes on hold
As someone said in another thread, this is human trafficking.
That’s the point, for you to be nervous. Most places don’t have any issues, but they’re screaming pretty loud about the few that do so people won’t vote. Please vote.
True, I just don’t want any part of it. They are evil though.
I don’t like wishing ill on anyone, but somehow we have to take back our government. They’re not following the law or precedent. There has to be a legal way.
It’s a pretty cool web design for explaining things.
I have no idea. Do whatever you feel comfortable doing. As I said, people are pretty savvy if they really want to read an article from the main source. I think it’s cool that you still want them to be paid though. All in your court.