Wednesday you’ll see Elon The Edgelord wearing that ‘Dont Bully Me I’ll Cum’ shirt.
Wednesday you’ll see Elon The Edgelord wearing that ‘Dont Bully Me I’ll Cum’ shirt.
Settings
Well they didn’t do it with Botox.
The outcome is not though. https://www.olshanlaw.com/sweepstakes-law-basics#:~:text=The official rules must typically,of entries by a single
Many lawsuits from many different states because of the Monopoly fiasco multiple times over proves this. As long as you don’t game the outcome while still claiming it is such, it’s neither a giveaway, nor a sweepstakes. That’s the loophole. All Musk has to do is proclaim he is a liar, which he will totally do when Trump loses. Hell, he could just call it staged and probably win in court.
Edit for proof: https://apnews.com/article/musk-million-sweepstakes-lottery-pennsylvania-krasner-4f683c48eb7dcc57f183e54ef16e7320
No, just don’t allow their votes to count.
Your goal isn’t super clear from the post.
Are you asking how to host an OS on an NFS share?
It’s a legal team whose job it is to lessen the damage.
A “donation” or “gift” to a specific person isn’t a crime.
Running a fucking giveaway or lottery is though.
I’m not his lawyer, but it certainly sounds like he didn’t consult with them before doing the thing, and this obviously shifty change in stance is because it’s his lawyers who found a way out of trouble for their client. I’m sure they have you beat on this.
So now they want to get blocked from exporting packages. Fucking down.
Fuck you, Russia.
I was expecting the butthole. Enjoyed the better joke and trip through it. ONN KILLIN IT
They only did a few, and then found a way out. If you “reveal” some other reasoning behind the curtain, that is what is considered admissible, legally in the US.
Example:
DA: “You are accused of running a lottery to get people to vote for a specific candidate, which is illegal. Is that what happened?”
Musk: “Nope, we lied about it being random, and the winners were specifically chosen, which is not a violation of the law”
Honestly, 800 stars isn’t a huge impact anymore on its own. I think the age of the repo and frequency of updates matters more. If there is a fork that is more active, people will switch to it.
Lolz. Sounds like somebody found a way to not get arrested.
Some states have open data. Unsure if it’s in Json though.
Humans aren’t math problems.
New Republic out with the plain and simple. Nice to see.
Also, this answer.
Yeah, so if you’re running rootless containers, they aren’t run by root, and for added security, you don’t want them run by your normal user because if they get broken, then they’d have access to what your user has access to. Just create another user that only runs containers, and doesn’t have access to your things or root.
Wireguard is a VPN, so that’s not going to help you much here unless you’re forwarding all your traffic through a remote server, in which case anyone gets in there will still be able to get your local machines. It’s another hop in the chain, but that’s about it.
If you want to be more on guard about reacting to attacks, or just bad traffic, you probably want something like Crowdsec. You’ll at least be able to detect and ban IPs probing your services. If that’s too much work, leverage OoenWRT reporting and some scripting to ban bad actors that probe your firewall and open ports. That’s a good first step.
If you’re concerned about the containers, consider using something more secure than dockerd. Podman rootless with a dedicated service user is a good start. Then maybe look at something more complex: Kata, gvisor, lxc…etc. The goal being sandboxing the containers more to prevent jailbreaks.
*stealing the designs for