• 0 Posts
  • 47 Comments
Joined 11 months ago
cake
Cake day: December 23rd, 2023

help-circle


  • It will be easier to hackers to hack 2FA when they know what the authenticator app is, versus hundreds of different authenticator clients.

    Security through obscurity is not security.

    Additionally, any method that generates a code locally that needs to match the server will not be secure if you can extract the key used locally. Yes you can argue that more users makes a juicier target, but I’d argue that Microsoft has the resources spend reducing the chance of an exploit and the resources to fix it fairly quickly. Much more so than any brand new team.

    The default authentication option for the company I work for is that a code is displayed in the screen of the device I’m logging into AND a push notification is sent to the Authenticator app, the app then prompts me to enter the code from authenticating device. To break that you’d need the username, password, a clone of the phone/device used to authenticate (or the original), and the user’s PIN for that device (MS Authenticator requires this to complete the authentication.)

    Yes MS Authentication services do sometimes go down, and yea it can impact my ability to work

    I am by no means a MS fanatic, but I’d trust them for mission critical authentication over something like Authy.


  • As a lay-person, it seems kind of light on details and a bit fanciful. The article states they created pancreatic islet seed cells, but fails to link how exactly this cures diabetes. (I’m assuming these cells create the insulin.)

    Another point is this seems to fly in t he face of what we’ve been told for decades, that diabetes can now be cured and not just managed. (I personally don’t have a problem with this, everything is impossible until it becomes possible.)

    The biggest issue I see is that this cured one person. Diabetes is a fairly common condition, they shouldn’t have had a problem getting more participants in a study.



  • The “cause” is quite simple: more visibility, knowledge regarding, and acceptance of neurodiversity.

    We don’t (usually) just beat kids until they learn to mask now.

    Yes we are testing more now that we better understand the conditions. It used to be “understood” that it was mostly boys who had ADHD. Now we understand that girls are/were taught to act in certain ways, forcing them to learn to mask more effectively.

    My spouse and I were both diagnosed with ADHD in our late 30s despite having visible symptoms as children.

    When I told my parents I was diagnosed with ADHD, their response was “well you turned out fine, didn’t you?”

    My employer acknowledges neurodiversity month with presentations by employees who are neurodiverse to help share their perspectives with the “normies.”

    My spouse and I are able to look at our children’s behaviors and see the actions through the lense of their being ADHDers. We are able to look back actions and responses of our parents while we were growing up and see their undiagnosed ADHD.

    In short, things like ADHD and Autism have been around a lot, in numbers higher than we used to diagnose, and were just getting better at spotting them.


  • The “cause” is quite simple: more visibility, knowledge regarding, and acceptance of neurodiversity.

    We don’t (usually) just beat kids until they learn to mask now.

    Yes we are testing more now that we better understand the conditions. It used to be “understood” that it was mostly boys who had ADHD. Now we understand that girls are/were taught to act in certain ways, forcing them to learn to mask more effectively.

    My spouse and I were both diagnosed with ADHD in our late 30s despite having visible symptoms as children.

    When I told my parents I was diagnosed with ADHD, their response was “well you turned out fine, didn’t you?”

    My employer acknowledges neurodiversity month with presentations by employees who are neurodiverse to help share their perspectives with the “normies.”

    My spouse and I are able to look at our children’s behaviors and see the actions through the lense of their being ADHDers. We are able to look back actions and responses of our parents while we were growing up and see their undiagnosed ADHD.

    In short, things like ADHD and Autism have been around a lot, in numbers higher than we used to diagnose, and were just getting better at spotting them.





  • That’d be like outlawing hammers because someone figured out they make a great murder weapon.

    Just because you can use a tool for crime, doesn’t mean that tool was designed/intended for crime.

    Not exactly. This would be more akin to a company that will 3D printer metal parts and assemble them for you. You use this service and have them create and assemble a gun for you. Then you use that weapon in a violent crime. Should the company have known better that you were having them create an illegal weapon on your behalf?



  • greentreerainfire@kbin.socialtoLefty Memes@lemmy.dbzer0.comEducation
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    You can teach them properly about capitalism by making them follow the rules to the letter and following slightly relaxed rules for yourself, such as starting with extra cash and the ability to take out interest-free loans on you properties while still collecting rent, and reducing the costs for you to buy houses and hotels because you can leverage market forces in you favor.

    New chance cards only you could get would include:

    You busted a union, collect $100

    Shorted stocks and left everyone else holding the bag, collect $25 from each player

    Caught Insider trading, pay $1 or go to jail until your next turn




  • Not sure how sarcastic you are, but I could see work camps being built. I think we’d see some deportations and some people sent to work camps, but not a complete crack down. Just enough to make it a threat.

    It’s not just the logistics of moving that many people that is a problem. It would be extremely damaging to the economy. Undocumented labor makes the food we have as cheap as it is (along with government subsidies). If that labor pool evaporated we’d see more widespread issues with food rotting before being picked and food not getting processed.

    The work camps would take the form of farms and food processing plants, possibly expanding to other manufacturing later. Free slave labor is how we’d compete against the slave labor in other countries. It’s important to note that managing that takes up a lot of resources, so I’d expect the majority to not be rounded up and sent to these camps. I’d expect the threat of being sent to a camp to be used to extract lower pay and more hours out of the existing undocumented population that works in those industries.

    Having these populations still intact would be useful to instigate more crackdowns as political events to provide a boost.

    The main problem with these camps (and existing populations) is that people have kids even under the worst circumstances. That is why we’re seeing the talking point to remove/overturn birthright citizenship. Eventually the camp population would be almost entirely us citizens which makes things less tenable. So they’d need to remain different so it’d be okay for them to stay in the camps they were born into.