I believe that Proxmox does this because I have installed/created containers from their available images. I wonder how they create those container images?
I believe that Proxmox does this because I have installed/created containers from their available images. I wonder how they create those container images?
A tactical tennis racket would also be useful in repelling the cobra chicken.
The cool thing about 1310nm light is that it will pass down either multimode or single mode fiber.
At that short of a distance, you should be able to use MM 1310nm SFPs.
As long as the SFPs can do the signalling speed needed by the link then I see no reason why it shouldn’t work.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
I don’t know. Some online forums are kind of sus, if you know what I mean. ;-) Usually, the ONT and the OLT are made by the same manufacturer ie: Alcatel Lucent. That means they are a matched pair because they speak their own digital dialect. Therefore, if you change the ONT then you are not guaranteed that they will understand each other.
In other words, I don’t recommend it.
That ONT is going to be a managed network endpoint. Their head-end system talks to it and sets up the configuration for the optical pathway. It is essential that it is not removed. If you replace it with something else then you will not get service.
I believe that you should be able to replace anything else downstream from the ONT. So that router can be replaced with whatever can handle the traffic flow. If it were my setup then I would replace it with my pfsense firewall box.
By the way, is this the kind of fiber cable you were thinking of? https://a.co/d/iJ0guG1
I just can’t stand Justin anymore. He’s got to go away.
It has just a little more travel than a laptop keyboard in my opinion.
I use it on my tv pc as well.
I like it.
In 1999, I bet he was running Gentoo.
I don’t get it.
Lot owner stunned to find $500K home accidentally built on her lot. Now she’s being sued March 28, 2024 at 12:21 pm EDT Annaleine Reynolds says she was shocked to find a home built on a lot she purchased in Puna, Hawaii, and told Hawaii News Now that she doesn’t want the house there and has had to deal with problems like higher taxes and squatters. A woman is headed to court after a Hawaii construction company built a half-million-dollar house on the wrong property, The Associated Press reported.
Read more trending news
Annaleine Reynolds says she was shocked to find a home built on a lot she purchased in Puna, Hawaii, and told Hawaii News Now that she doesn’t want the house there and has had to deal with problems like higher taxes and squatters.
Reynolds said she purchased a lot in 2018 at a county tax auction for about $22,500. She had intended to use the land for meditative healing women’s retreats.
“There’s a sacredness to it and the one that I chose to buy had all the right qualities,” she said.
Reynolds was planning how to use the property when the COVID-19 pandemic hit, keeping her in California.
While in California, the lot was bulldozed, and a house was built there. Reynolds knew nothing about the three-bedroom, two-bath home, now valued at $500,000, being built, she said.
She found out about the home when she got a call last year from a real estate broker.
“He told me, ‘I just sold the house, and it happens to be on your property. So, we need to resolve this,’” Reynolds said. “And I was like, what? Are you kidding me?”
Local developer Keaau Development Partnership hired PJ’s Construction to build about a dozen homes on the properties the developer bought in the subdivision. But the company accidentally built one on Reynolds’ lot.
According to KKTV, the lots are identified by information on telephone poles.
To add insult to injury, Reynolds is being sued by the property’s developers. The developers say they offered to swap Reynolds a lot that is next door to hers or to sell her the house at a discount.
Reynolds has refused both offers.
“It would set a dangerous precedent if you could go onto someone else’s land, build anything you want, and then sue that individual for the value of it,” James DiPasquale, Reynold’s attorney, told Hawaii News Now.
Reynolds has filed a counterclaim against the developer, saying she was unaware of the “unauthorized construction.”
Also being sued by the developers are the construction company, the home’s architect, the family who previously owned the property, and the county, which approved the permits.
The home remains empty, except for some squatters, according to neighbors.
The $500,000 mistake is headed to a courtroom to be settled.
© 2024 Cox Media Group
Love that third arm! Super creepy!
Altium
Wasn’t he commenting on the taste of root beer?
Amos is channeling his inner Klingon!!!
Hee hee hee!!!
I LOVE CARTALK WITH MARTOK!!!
😆🤩😂🤣🤟🏻👍🏻🎉
If that is a real product, could someone tell me what it is so I can research it?