![](/static/790fef6/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemm.ee/api/v3/image_proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhexbear.net%2Fpictrs%2Fimage%2F6f8ff6f6-cbb8-4bfa-a279-257c53e1aaf8.jpeg)
I reckon you can do bubble and squeak but sub out cabbage for leeks
I reckon you can do bubble and squeak but sub out cabbage for leeks
I think it’s kind of an already argued point that most people conceded decades ago, what’s there to talk about?
Not long ago, it used to be your money was worth a set amount of gold, tangible gold bullion you were guaranteed you could get for your dollar, but now it’s fiat. And fiat is a just a euphemism for “its imaginary”. Not that gold bullion has a great practical value either.
I personally don’t think I post anything that’s likely to be cracked down upon. But I still largely agree, and I think that’s a far more reasonable concern and good reason to opsec, depending on what you’re putting out there.
Static typing is for wusses who can’t handle dynamic, go-getter variables
Of course, in Python, you can slice with [start:end:step], so it is valid to do list[:3:3]
for double the happiness. Not that you’d ever practically do so.
I really did assume this post was ironic. Worrying number of people here really concerned that Trump is going to come deploy Navy SEAL team six to their house for calling him a poopypants.
And he is a poopypants.
executed at Gitmo under the Trump dictatorship for being mean to him online
It really, really won’t. There are many good reasons to maintain opsec, thinking this is a likely outcome is not one.
On the other hand, I think some people are quite paranoid. There’s a balance to be had.
I’m late to respond, but heck yeah, thanks for this reply. Exactly what I imagined.
What I’m hearing is that the left should start demanding to double the population with exclusively trans people, effectively a -100% murder rate. Then the middle ground will be 0% and centrists can finally agree.
deleted by creator
I highly doubt it’s even the world’s shortest international bridge. Many nations’ borders follow a tiny brook or stream, which will likely be bridged at some point.
I already know and agree with what you’ve said here. I would happily concede that both of our positions lack good evidence for a wide, systematic effect.
I can only share my experience which is proof that, at least in my tiny part of the world, these protests have worked. You’re very welcome to have anecdotal evidence to the contrary, I was just sharing my own and I’m unsure why I’m getting logic’d for it. I think perhaps you’re inferring a much larger claim from my words than I was trying to make.
The claim does lack evidence, I agree! I’m only speaking anecdotally - But that’s a little more evidence than the claim that the protests don’t work.
I know a couple people who outspoken about climate change for scientific or observable reasons.
But I know more who are outspoken because they’re polarised against fuddy-duddy conservative anti-climate-protestor attitudes.
Because it’s largely made up and vastly exaggerated. If people had actual details or critically thought about what ‘russian disinformation’ really was, it wouldn’t be an effective boogeyman to blame for all the world’s ills.
Somehow the west has found a way to say “You’re right our democracy is broken, but it’s all Russia’s fault!!!”
The Chinese Communist Party of China
The codec pack was named after the USSR, it was great.
These protests do work. And is suspected to be largely behind why a fair fraction of the population care about climate change. And working class people will be pressed into cleaning up the mess of direct action too, so I don’t understand the argument there.
Fucking up rich people’s pretty shit is a perfectly valid, if somewhat toothless, response. Yes, direct action is better, but is also more heavily violently cracked down on, the mass movement needed to make it viable isn’t there.
Leekspin cosplay