Should they have included each candidate’s stance on grabbing women by their privates?

You really don’t want deflation. The correct thing now is for wages to go up to match the new costs and this has been happening.

Only the wealthy would hold on to their money, which they’re already doing.

No, they invest it otherwise it loses value over time. Invested money is put to work.

Fair response - thanks for your insight.

These people use research the same way a drunkard uses a lamppost - for support rather than illumination.

(Paraphrasing)

You weren’t supposed to read the study! 😅

rclone & restic work okay together to create backups in a Google drive mount. There are “issues” with backing up to Google drive since it doesn’t guarantee file names are unique which is… a choice… but it should be reliable enough.

The court ruled on it, because it now became a matter of law, it must be decided first to know which laws apply in the case

BTW - I would love to see the court ruling you think decided that “Fox News” is “entertainment” and not “news” as a finding of fact.

Hint - then thing you’re going to find will talk about the difference between “statements of facts” and of “opinion”. Which is not saying that “Fox is entertainment not news”. Those terms apply to any speech that is being claimed as defamatory.

Nobody “licenses” or decides what is “news” or “entertainment”. Jesus Christ - where do you people get this shit?

deleted by creator

“Journalism laws” 🤣🤣🤣

Courts do not rule on what is news or entertainment 🤣

If memory serves, Shelby was just about the ability of the DOJ to require states from the former Confederacy to get DOJ’s approval before making any changes to their election laws, where this is about DOJ’s ability to monitor any state’s actual implementation of their election laws

This is quite incorrect. I would read the link I provided.

As for how likely it is that you actually get hit - do you think it’s easier to avoid a 2’ x 6’ object moving at 15 mph or a 8’ x 16’ object moving at 45 mph?

The cars are where I expect them to be - and they are much more likely to slow if they see me on the crosswalk. Dude on a bike just swerves around me at speed.

Cyclists like to think they’re still pedestrians when it suits their purpose.

I’m quite surprised he hasn’t already.

…it

…it probably is.

Since Shelby v Holder they are restrained in where they can monitor - they need a court order to do so and can’t follow old guidelines that let them monitor in “historically racist” locations like Texas.

https://www.justice.gov/crt/about-federal-observers-and-election-monitoring

This isn’t a criminal trial

What are those cyclists having accidents with? Magical monoliths that appear out of nowhere or… cars?

Yeah… Whenever I’m on foot in the city I’m twice as nervous about being hit by a cyclist as I am a car.

They ride on sidewalks, don’t stop at lights, weave through pedestrians at crosswalks, etc.

They seem to be so full of themselves for not being in a car that they forget that they can also injure people.

If someone’s feelings are hurt by a silly url, it’s me that should grow up?

Yes. It’s you who should realize that other people’s perspectives, thoughts, opinions, etc. matter. It’s something one typically learns as they grow into adulthood.

“when you grow up” is what people say when their skin starts to grow over the mask they wear.

#7thgradedeep