Compromise, then?

Perhaps every other night you can cook from scratch, and cook as she likes on other days. Or, you could try to replicate the flavors she’s looking for in your cooking. Involve her, have her try tasting some sauce you’re making or whathaveyou and then try to see if you can nudge the flavors in a direction she likes.

As much as it might’ve hurt for Biden to do so, he will likely be remembered as one of the best presidents for that decision alone, putting the fate of the country before personal ambition.

Didn’t they take the gallows at J6 into evidence?

If they’re sitting around in an evidence locker, that’d be some nice symbolism to use them on him.

It says electioneering is prohibited. It does not elaborate on what that actually means, and whether that covers apparel. Other states do. This one doesn’t. I don’t know why this is so hard for you to comprehend.

Murder is defined rigorously in laws concerning it. You’re right, they do not specify method, but they do have incredible detail and granularity in what constitutes 1st degree murder vs 2nd degree murder vs 3rd degree murder vs manslaughter (which is distinct from 3rd degree murder, though similar), and go into detail clarifying which is which so that criminals may be prosecuted accordingly.

There is no such granularity or clarity on the definition of electioneering in the statute as written. This is not up for debate, it just straight up doesn’t bother defining it. It is plainly visible that it just says “x is prohibited”, without actually defining what is and is not considered x, where other states DO. Your inability to comprehend this is not my problem, if you choose to extract meaning from text that is not there, I don’t know how to help you and will not be engaging with you further since you choose not to listen.

BTW, Its quite ironic your calling someone stupid for lack of reading comprehension

Lastly, *it’s & *you’re. I could also call you stupid for your grammar, if you prefer.

Best of luck in life, sport.

Shit, I hope we get programmable ammo for the AMR. Being able to select explosive rounds vs heavy penetrating rounds vs EMP/stun rounds would be rad.

Yeah, I didn’t want to say it quite so harshly, but while I would welcome a heavy penetrating primary rifle that can punch holes in those armored up garbage trucks, I can’t help but think it would just negate any reason to bring the AMR. They’d have to give the AMR a buff it frankly doesn’t need (really, it’s good where it is) to keep it relevant – and then yes, indeed, it might as well be firing 20mm.

also yeah even a bullet that can (or should) punch holes in bug armor should not be capable of penetrating literal, actual tanks; as tank armor has outgrown what is capable of being penetrated by something man-portable (or, well – shoulder-firing, closed breech guns, to be more specific) since the 1940s. An overambitious ant, yes, sure, punching holes through thick chitin I can believe; but not engineered thick steel plate.

What I want to know is, did any of these people look into the shit he and his father pulled in real estate? Donald Trump has been a racist piece of shit since at least the 1970s, and probably earlier. Voting for him as a black man, that’s a level of self hatred rivaling Uncle Ruckus.

yeah tbh I think OP’s playing the wrong game if they’re looking for a sniping experience. Sniping usually involves staying a long ways away from the action, HD2 has enemies constantly spawning on or very near your position. The only way to effectively snipe when that happens is to get really really good at repositioning to higher ground really quickly, and sometimes that isn’t really an option, jump pack be damned, depending on map conditions. In fact frequently, even if you are on higher ground where bugs shouldn’t be able to get to you, they will often phase upwards through the terrain to reach you.

On bots, sure, they can engage from longer distances, but the same problem applies – they drop in pretty close, making whatever advantage you have from distance, disappear.

They’re not called sniper rifles. They’re categorized in your loadout as “Marksman rifles”. Important distinction. Marksman rifles are usually in lighter calibers than true “sniper rifles”, as they’re meant for shorter ranges.

The AMR, as someone else mentioned, is an anti-materiel sniper rifle. Now, I agree that the counter sniper should have heavy pen and the diligence should have medium, because it would make them both more useful on bugs and bots alike (though mostly bugs, they’re already great on bots). But they should absolutely be doing less damage than the AMR, and that’s gonna be a hard balance to strike – how would you be able to justify the AMR’s existence and use if a primary weapon could do what it does?

Conservatives are happier? Since when?

Like, I can disprove that by turning on Fox News for two minutes. It’s nothing but 24/7 anger porn and rage bait.

It doesnt need to say it explicitly and its wording is all exclusive.

actually, yes, most laws do have to explicitly lay out what is considered illegal, so that you can be charged with a crime under them. That’s kind of a critical part of lawmaking, painstakingly defining what constitutes breaking the law is what prevents legal loopholes. I really hope your day job isn’t in law, if you don’t know that. In this case, they failed to adequately define what constitutes electioneering.

Or are you going to try and argue a shirt that litterally says "Vote for " isnt soliciting because “the law didnt say anything about shirts!”

I didn’t wear a shirt that says “Vote for” though. I wore a shirt like this and a hat like this. You’d know that if you actually bothered to read what I wrote. They don’t endorse any specific candidate. Nice strawman tho.

I see you didn’t actually bother to read what I posted. In that link, it says

“21 states prohibit campaign apparel/buttons/stickers/placards” and “Table 2 provides additional information for the 21 states that have statutory restrictions on apparel in the polling place.”

If you scroll down, you will further see that Pennsylvania is not one of those states. The shirt isn’t a poster on a wall. The shirt isn’t soliciting anyone’s vote for any particular candidate. The actual code, as you have so helpfully posted, makes no mention of apparel. It says no person shall solicit people or hang signs, neither of which I did – and the shirt doesn’t count as a person, nor does it count as “posting a sign within the room”. It’s fucking wearing clothing. You could argue that clothing is electioneering all you want, but since the law doesn’t explicitly say wearing clothing is electioneering – where many other states have made the distinction that apparel is or isn’t – I doubt that would hold up in a Pennsylvania court if you had even a slightly competent lawyer, since the law does not codify that wearing clothing is considered electioneering.

You’ll also note that neither the shirt or the hat makes any particular endorsement of any particular candidate, they don’t even specifically name Trump. They do strongly imply I want to be rid of a particular candidate, but it doesn’t tell people to vote for any specific opponent. This also means it fails the “for any political party, political body or candidate” part – they don’t tell anyone to vote for a particular candidate.

It’s okay, I forgive your stupidity.

“and I don’t appreciate you trying to intimidate me, so I guess we’re even”

Actually no, because there isn’t a provision about apparel in my state (Pennsylvania) and is thus not considered electioneering. Signs, banners, literature, all a no-go within ten feet (and the line was so long that, if this was enforced, I’d simply go shirtless and hatless for the last… ten minutes we were there?), but it doesn’t say a damn thing about clothing. But thanks for playing.

Edit: lmao @ all the people downvoting as if I’m wrong when not one person there told me I couldn’t wear what I wore. Not the two cops at the metal detector at the front, not any of the cops inside the building, nor the election worker who we got ballots from. I think if it was illegal, they’d have been the first to ask me to leave (and they didn’t), but clearly you all know the local laws better than… people working in the county courthouse. Yeah, I’ll bet lmao

deleted by creator

I went to vote early wearing a bright orange “vote | removes stubborn orange stains” t shirt + a pseudo-MAGA hat saying “Make lying wrong again”. The person I went with to vote thought I would get my ass kicked by someone for wearing it. I’m a 6’4 man and wanted someone to start some shit like this in the courthouse, I’d have them on the floor before security could intervene – and of course nobody did because fascists are also fucking cowards and only punch downwards. What a fuckhead, I hope they try him as an adult.

I know the next few months will be rough if he loses, but with a functioning government in office for another four years, they don’t stand a chance of doing anything other than make noise and perhaps mild domestic terrorism. But they can’t get nearly so close to a coup without being in power.

On the other hand, if he wins, we’re all fucked.

The first time I had a conversation about something and then started getting ads for that thing on my phone was the first time I went “ok nope not ok with that not ok with that at all” with regards to privacy and I’ve only gotten more and more pissed off since.

being fair, this election cycle has made it genuinely hard to tell at a glance.

If I had a nickel for every time I went this past year after reading a headline and then realizing it isn’t the onion, I’d be a very rich man.

why must you hurt us in this way?