Three raccoons in a trench coat. I talk politics and furries.

https://www.youtube.com/@ragdoll_x

https://ragdollx.substack.com

https://twitter.com/x_ragdoll

  • 141 Posts
  • 408 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 20th, 2023

help-circle
  • lmao no wonder something looked so off to me, the HD verision makes it even clearer that it’s AI-generated, even more so considering the website it came from.

    Interestingly enough even the larger image on the original website fooled most of the AI image detectors, with only one of them (isitai.com) just barely saying that the image is probably AI-generated, while all the others said with >90% confidence that it wasn’t.

    I can only speculate that all of these detectors are outdated and were trained with older AI-generated images that were easier to detect.







  • Ragdoll X@lemmy.worldtoScience Memes@mander.xyzAspirations
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    108
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Sometimes you have to use complicated terms because you’re dealing with complicated ideas…

    Other times it’s clear that the authors are just trying to pad the length of a paper and sound more pompous.

    In Brazil we call this “enchendo linguiça”, which literally translates to “filling sausage”.



  • Ragdoll X@lemmy.worldto196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneyikes rule
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    84
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Although I haven’t read Lolita myself I recently came across a great video explaining how many people misunderstand the book as being some sort of tragic romance. LOLITA: The Worst Masterpiece

    It’s ironic that one of the most famous and successful writers in the world made this same mistake of trusting and sympathizing with the pedophilic murderer protagonist while claiming that she wants to protect women and children from the evil trans agenda or whatever.







  • Ragdoll X@lemmy.worldto196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneStone Rule
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    I didn’t hear about the vandalizing of private jets until people were complaining about stone henge.

    It’d be a bit odd if you had heard about the jets before the Stonehenge stunt since they vandalized the jets one day after Stonehenge. I heard about each of them on the day they happened as I was listening to the news.

    this does seem like a much more effective way of bringing attention to the issue.

    Even most leftists didn’t support the Stonehenge stunt while the majority of comments and posts I’ve seen on the vandalism of the jets was positive. The majority of the public has grievances towards private jets, their pollution and who’s using them, and how they should be taxed. You’ll be hard-pressed to find anyone who thinks Stonehenge is bad or that vandalizing it is good.

    This only serves to make them and other climate activists look like petty fools, besides creating infighting on the left. Nearly everyone already knows about climate change and has an opinion on it, and the Stonehenge stunt does nothing to move the public to our side or make Just Stop Oil look good.


  • Ragdoll X@lemmy.worldto196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneStone Rule
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    17 days ago

    The Stonehenge stunt was an ineffective attention grab. Vandalizing the private jets was an effective attention grab.

    Like if some Just Stop Oil activist took a shit in the middle of a busy NY street that would get them a lot of attention, but it wouldn’t be even remotely positive or effective in any way.

    They should stick to vandalizing the property of the biggest culprits of climate change. I and most other leftists can get behind that, and it actually puts a spotlight on the people causing the problem. The Stonehenge stunt just comes off as a petty attack on the public who has little to no say on climate issues.


  • Ragdoll X@lemmy.worldto196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneStone Rule
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    made climate activists look stupid for decades to come over some nonsensical and ineffective attention grab

    didn’t stop climate change

    Yeah, seems about right.

    They had the right idea when they spray painted those private jets. IDK what they were thinking with the Stonehenge stunt.



  • Ragdoll X@lemmy.worldtoScience Memes@mander.xyzElsevier
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    18 days ago

    As someone who’s not too familiar with the bureaucracy of academia I have to ask: Can’t the authors just upload all their studies to ResearchGate or some other website if they want? I know that they often share it privately with others when they request a paper, so can they post it publicly too?





  • Not sure how deeply positive it was necessarily, but as far as I can tell I changed at least one person’s life significantly.

    When I was in middle school I learned how to solve the Rubik’s cube through online tutorials, and afterwards I was basically addicted to it for a while and I was messing with a cube all the time. One of my classmates was interested in learning how to solve one, so I drew a bunch of guides and taught him the terminology, and soon enough he was also hooked on the Rubik’s cube.

    I eventually grew tired of it, but he kept going and learned how to solve all sorts of smaller and bigger cubes and pyramids. I bumped into him at uni a few years later and he had a cube in his hand lol. Last I heard of him he was even participating in some local competitions, but idk what he’s up to now.

    Even if he ultimately gave up on his speedcubing dreams I can at least say that I introduced him to a cool new hobby that kept him entertained for several years.