![](/static/790fef6/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemm.ee/api/v3/image_proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmidwest.social%2Fpictrs%2Fimage%2F6f908f10-c6fa-4610-8be3-236e4ae0663d.webp)
Overall? Capitalism. You?
Overall? Capitalism. You?
Aw, I love you too! That’s why I’m trying to help you make better jokes. Like, you were so close, but it just didn’t land right with the point you were making.
Then you should have made it an actual response to those comments.
If by neat you mean it undermined your argument, then yes, it was neat!
I mean, you’re literally the one who started the argument, being dismissive and condescending about it now just makes you look like a sore loser.
Yes, we all agree on that fact. The discussion progressed to two different commentors’ active voice re-writes of the original sentence.
The discussion was active voice vs passive voice, not functionality of active voice vs functionality of differently-worded active voice. They’re both still active voice.
They’re both active voice, they just have different verbs.
No it’s like firing the head chef who’s always passed out in the walk-in and hoping one of the sous chefs who actually work the line every night making the food will give you Michelin-quality food. I mean, maybe not Harris in particular, but you get the point.
Not to familiar with the Supreme Court I see. I have some bad news…
Did you intentionally pick the worst metaphor possible, given the context? Because that was the worst metaphor possible, given the context.
deleted by creator
They’re not overly defensive, they’re just regular defensive because everyone is ignoring what they say and calling them a liar & an alcoholic over and over. They’re being very reasonable and thoughtful, they’re not calling people ugly names or insulting anyone’s family. How is that overly defensive?
But I thought more guns = more safety? Wha’ happened?
Well they’re infinitely less funny if you need it explained and no one explains it, so thank you!
No amount of progressivism can stop people from getting mental illnesses.
I read the article if that’s what you mean. 🤷♂️
He also needs to not be a racist, ablist piece of shit. This goes way beyond venting, this dude believes in ethnic cleansing and shit. I’m surprised there were no phrenology-related questions.
That’s why I said we should promote one of the sous chefs that are actually doing the head chef’s work! If Biden is just a proxy candidate for the administration, then it could be literally anyone. Including someone without the glassy-eyed stare of senility, assuming someone like that exists in the Democratic Party leadership.