Don’t spread it around. It’s a complete fraud of a paper for all we know. Just the fact that it has convincing rebuttals is enough to make you consider it irrelevant.
Don’t spread it around. It’s a complete fraud of a paper for all we know. Just the fact that it has convincing rebuttals is enough to make you consider it irrelevant.
Hahaha, the pride of The Gravy Seals 😂
I remember reading this simply terrible article in Scientific American; the entire article was based on this research paper referred to the meme above.
The paper was a complete fraud, and people just guzzled the cool-aid. He’ll they still do, looking at this thread.
Not necessarily, but a Drilling has always been a more expensive weapon (and still is) due to having three barrels.
It is, however, still popular, especially among Grouse hunters, despite the price.
I always wondered how much IGN is commissioned to write these nonsense articles for promotion.
Try thousands. Most expensive ship runs you about 3000$
No but see, the issue is that you act like a cunt; therefore you are a cunt.
Get a grip, dude.
It is sort of interesting that Bo, in a way, depicts his version of the Sacrifice of Isaac, otherwise a very popular reanissanse motive; the scene having been painted by Carvaggio, Rembrandt and Filippo Lippi.
Mm, is that why Silent Hill 2 sits on ‘Overmevmingly positive’ while still plagued by serious performance issues?
The statement is simply not true; gamers are willing to swallow just about anything if sold correctly.
Ok, I will try to consume less activated charcoal 🙄
Dear guy in the comments; please reply to me in ‘Rich White Man’.
I knew it, I fucking knew I recognized Vance from somewhere!
The issue started long before M formed the current right wing administration. He’ll, it started before even the last two S formed left wing administrations…
Needless to say, people don’t like you.
In Ireland, two Guinness is considered a meal
Heartwrenching stuff you got there, only it’s not what we’re discussing…
I really don’t think I did
So they’re well compensated, so what’s the problem you mean? They aren’t forced to accept it…
No, you’re thinking of philosophy. Philosophy is a discussion. Science is a process. Just the fact that they are being accused of being misleading and outright falsyfyiing evidence is enough to simply ignore their purported results until they can produce a paper that fixes all those problems.
It’s not a discussion whether we can agree on something. The evidence should do the only talking.