I like your worldview.

I’ve been having a surge of anxiety and anger about this election. I really hope I can see things your way… Right now, it doesn’t feel that peace is an option. It doesn’t seem like we’ll get the choice.

You are on the lazy-meme community…

Just to be clear, it’s the media’s fault I’ve had back-to-back panic attacks about whether or not I’ll have rights in 3mo? Sick…

There also aren’t a lot of totalitarian governments that cease their tyranny because the opposing populace hold peaceful protest. Eventually, prospects will become better only when the institution burns.

That said, I don’t relish the thought of tearing down an institution that people rely on for personal stability and safety, but if the system’s malicious actions outweigh the good that said system does passively, then the only option, the last option, is violence.

No, because some States have entrenched parties that wish to stay entenched. And since we’re 50 countries in a trench coat, nothing will change about that soon unless you live there and enjoy making gasoline cocktails.

This, except that the foundations that lead to change are laid on election night. Yes the cement was mixed and the scaffolding raised, but today sets the tools we have to work with to enact that change for the next 4 (or rarely 2) years.

Oops! You missed the disclaimer: *of all participants polled, including only individuals who opted in to the poll, on this specific website or streetside polling campus, during these specific hours in the day.

Edit: Apologies if any of this was misleading. I only meant to point out that polls often have hidden implicit biases due to the nature of their process.

Welcome to automated warfare. Imagine a mass-cas squad engagement and after the shooting stops you realize the shooter was safe in a bunker a mile away.

The “royal he”

You claim to be looking for a good faith argument but you’ll only respond to the poster being hostile to you. The cognitive dissonance is about expected, but no one is stopping you from claiming this hill of assumptions as your moral highground.

Lmao. Ok buddy. Sure, you’re a leftist. Yup.

Do all you 'publicans share the same braincell, or do you just collectively turn them all off until a Fox anchor starts talking?

Oh my god I looked more closely. I think that’s acrylic resin. Ew.

I see no before picture so I assume the marble flooring and countertops. Plus the mosaic backsplash tiling maybe? And it’s entirely possible those are brand new cupboards.

This has been happening for 2 years now. We get a new incident almost monthly, and 10x as many failed attempts.

Alternatively, Biden genuinely believed what he was saying/being told until the facts flew in the face of that assessment, and is too politically hog-tied to back out of existing deals. This could still be a turning point, and while that’s little comfort to the dead, it may yet save those who might become so otherwise.

Your options are “OK” and “Cancel.” The latter kills all subprpcesses and any promise of improvement. Most users have already selected “OK” so your lack of processing doesn’t actually cause an app crash on the backend.

It’s also worth noting that they’re not like… Just trying to kill each other. They’re putting on a show. Sure he could probably just impale his opponent, but this was less deathmatch and more WWE. They had sponsors, insurance, and lived long lives under the less bloodthirsty emperors, becoming celebrities throughout the empire.

Leverage vs. reach. It is easier to control your opponents weapon if you manipulate the leaver point thats farthest away from the wrist. Given that he’s facing a gladus and buckler (equivailant to a sidearm when compared to a lance or javelin), he does not need to worry about reach, and given that he can’t two-hand the weapon without disusing the net, his best option is to give his opponent a shorter fulcrum while still retaining enough length to control the distance.

I can field strip a G2 blindfolded. Hu-ah!