![](/static/790fef6/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemm.ee/api/v3/image_proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Flemmygrad.ml%2Fpictrs%2Fimage%2F4e58a8f3-bc0c-4eaa-a238-9acca7165cac.jpeg)
capitalism became what it is today because that is its natural course, u cant keep capitalism from monopoly and rent seeking. Eventually someone will win when there is competition.
capitalism became what it is today because that is its natural course, u cant keep capitalism from monopoly and rent seeking. Eventually someone will win when there is competition.
i cant be sure this is satirical, i can imagine her doing that.
Yeah libs can be pretty annoying when they talk in terms of idealized versions of reality. Same with the crony capitalism bs.
What can u expect from an institution built with opium trade money.
Yeah, i know, i read it cuz i was curious what their definition of the global north was and what percent of the population it made up. And i would agree that the imperialist dynamics described are super important but in the post the simple fact that the global south does 90% of the labor is presented as significant in its own right which what i dont get. I mean it is significant in a way but its just as significant as pointing out that the vast vast majority of the population is in the global south, idk seems too simple to even point out.
I thought about how to phrase my original comment quite a bit and i was going to include some of the fact u quoted as things which are quite significant compared to what is said in the post but decided against because it because it kinda sounded like i was dismissing imperialism as relevant but maybe i should have just to avoid this exact responses.
I dont really understand what u are getting at here the global south does 90% of the labor in the world cuz thats where around 90% of the working population lives. This on its own doesnt really mean anything.
im sure its an influence/inspiration but i think generally people draw from their own stories and folklore, so if thats what u meant i would guess it wont have a big impact.
ive been reading “Kill Anything That Moves: The Real American War in Vietnam” and at some point the author points out that anti war people before the amerikkkan war in Vietnam predicted that North Vietnam would be the most bombed country in history but it actually ended up being South Vietnam their own supposed allies. Having amerikkkans “defend” “you” is probably worse than literally nothing.
they have been, a lot of game companies have released their games officially in China over the last 5 or so years. They usually have to get localized because most people in China dont speak english and often they have to remove skulls or blood from the game.
i think the fact that militias are legal is a lot less useful than it appears, when the black panthers did just that the government made gun control more stringent, and eventually they just murdered and assassinated most of their leaders and arrested their members anyways. When it really gets down to it the liberal state will break its own principles to keep the “peace”.
i know someone already made a more specific suggestion but: https://annas-archive.org/ I have found almost every single book i have looked for there.
the thing u are missing is that white supremacists and the like are not terrorist they are lone wolfs and they commit isolated incidents rather than terrorist attacks
what i think is more likely is that like of lot of liberal communities they have a lists of communities that they automatically ban anyone who is subscribed to them, and that list is mostly leftist communities
it hardly even warrants the term government either
maybe, but no the fauna was not already here a lot of animals were brought over last century as exotic pets and zoo exhibits which were lost or thrown out and now they are destroying the actual local fauna.
shouldn’t it be the other way around?
where are the “its about preserving history” clowns? They better be boiling in rage wherever it is they dwell.
france, i dont think i need to elavorate.