deleted by creator

He absolutely did not.

No problem! Hope this wasn’t to much of a bother.

It’s pretty obvious that the original person they’re talking about is a women, and it’s a common jab used by mainly incels and in general misogynists as an immediate attack of a women’s character since that makes them “lesser” for having been promiscuous. So that makes it doubly weird when the op, no matter how liberal they are, mentions nothing about sleeping around or having sex, and you use it as part of the stereotype. Not that people like that don’t exist, but it’s a strange distinction to make.

I don’t mean to say you’re wrong about anything else you said, but it was a bit rough adding that into the comment.

The “slept around” part of your comment feels weird I’m going to be honest. They don’t mention anything along those lines and it really comes across as like the common misogynistic jab.

It was created by the French in the 1960s as an alternative to the hammer and sickle because of anti-soviet sentiment. It’s supposed to represent a better world and the solidarity needed to reach it.

In the West, Trotskyism is also seen as an acceptable alternative to “Stalinism” and the Soviet Union.

It’s the reason mindset behind why liberals idealise failed revolutions but despise those that succeed.

A better translation would probably be:

“Monarchist Gentlemen! Asses for inspection!”

Hey Google. What percentage of cowboys were black ex-slaves, Latinos, Native Americans, or poor white immigrants?

Oh… all of them? That’s crazy

Have you seen Hinkle speak? He is 100% a fed.

Because your post implies that a rise in foreign investment is a precursor to regime change and coup attempts. In my original comment I’m telling you that Russia is also counted in the foreign investment number so colour revolution based only off of this data is unlikely.

You do realize that “foreign investment” also includes investments from Russia, correct?

Huh? Eckharts ladder is nothing like the 2015 anti-sjw chuds. He’s just a basic lore channel?

They support Palestine because they want Jews to die. They see it as Arabs killing Jews, and are overjoyed.

The death penalty has no place in a socialist state. Once the revolution passes the initial stage, the death penalty becomes purely a tool of retribution and vengeance, the same as it is in a liberal state.

What’s ass backwards if your takes.

This feels eerily close to the line of thinking that libs use when they say, “Oh? You want to get rid of the death penalty and focus on rehabilitation? Even for murderers, rapists, and war criminals? You must be evil then too.”

Taking an extremely uncharitable view of 666’s words and then somehow trying to say that he somehow believes that billionaires shouldn’t feel the consequences of their actions is bizarre.

Obviously you can always find some asinine edge case for absolutely every statement, but that doesn’t make the rebuttal strong at all.

Does it really count as the WW2 era? It was produced to late to see combat and active service on any front, and was relegated to a second line role since the Soviets abandoned the heavy tank concept relatively soon after.

They aren’t explicitly anti-communist, but they are a product of the utter despair and collapse of the Eastern bloc countries in the 90s and 2000s, when living standards fell far below that of third world countries, and millions starved, suffered, and died.

So it’s more of an angsty, anti-authority stance where they blame the communists for causing that despair.

Their other songs also lay blame on the Orthodox Church, fascists, and liberal sympathizers.

So they’re not Nazis, but they’re definitely not pro communist.

How are you going to finance this venture? Who is going to fund this?

The vast majority of German corporations and the state department made their fortunes by giddily hightailing it to Poland and using the millions of individuals marked for extermination as expendable slave labour to reduce their labour cost to essentially zero, since they didn’t even need to bother taking care of them since they’d die either way.

Is that not essentially identical to the Scramble for Africa and India?