• 0 Posts
  • 13 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 14th, 2023

help-circle
  • What is… a convoluted poorly overseen scheme to feed public money to cronies and businesses under the guise of keeping people employed. Sure a good portion of the smaller businesses followed the rules and ended up getting not enough to really make up the difference. But those big boys with their astute accounting departments fed from that money trough like the disgusting bloated economic hogs that they are.








  • Without watching the video, for me Patriotism was always supporting our country striving for improvements and finding pride in our accomplishments while correcting our errors.

    Nationalism is just the our country is the best noone else is better and fuck anyone else. Also we never make mistakes and all we do is the beat.
    A sort of extremist no thought approach to our country just because we were born here.

    Patriotism requires thought nuance and a desire to build a better neighborhood so to speak.

    Just my thoughts.




  • Care to elaborate more on that?

    I mean this case according to some who have a law background have called into question the standing on which this case was even brought forward. The initial request of the so called web developer does not even seem to exist as stated. It was an intial inquiry by a straight individual who did not even request a web page designed for a homosexual wedding. Nor has the individual who may or may not have made the offending request been a party to the case other than in name. The so called web developer also seems to have a questionable existence as they seem so deeply intermeshed with a religious conservative activist group that they seem part of the same entity. And could at a slightly closer look seen to be just a front entity for such activist group to trigger such a lawsuit.

    The court should have passed on this case and it should have gone back down to a lower court and standing should have been better established. This case was just put together to create this type of ruling in a favorable court. Not a pursuit of justice or a clarifying of rights.
    I am not a lawyer, and I know next to nothing about the law but this case stinks to high heaven.



  • Even the hint of impropriety, or impartiality should be enough to cause a justice to recuse themselves or at the very least cause an issue with them sitting for a trial in which they have some connection.
    To have justices not abiding by that concept almost eliminates any authority or respect that the institution holds, and calls into question any ruling the court has had since these jokers were seated.

    Might as well just abandon the law and just go with might makes right rules, and fuck all this civilized stuff!
    We as a general people have been spending centuries trying to get away from that shit so we can prosper, fuckers want to go back to lords and petty tyrants!