I like not killing people. Especially not civilians. Not killing civilians is cool.

beehaw defederates from like every instance with more than a thousand users. they are bizarrely insular

“stupid idiot victim of the system. why don’t you commit politically motivated violence like a cool person”

Democrats are so full of themselves, they won’t accept that they might have to step out of the way to prevent the republicans from ruining this country

you mean like biden did?

More to the point, people need to not be told they’re stupid for not already understanding everything there is to know about the theory you’re peddling by a person who has taken some pains to avoid explaining any aspect of that theory.

do you understand how much of the civil rights movement has happened since the eighties?

we’ve made them make concessions before. we’ve won before. we could win again.

and you… you ^{have no idea how badly i wish i believed what i just said.}

It’s not just grad and hexbear. Beehaw is doing it too.

Positive vibes only space, my ass.

Update: I never wanna hear anybody talk about how cool drag is ever again

I’m sure the trans people whose lives are now in danger will sleep much better tonight knowing that the blood of those Palestinian children who are going to continue dying because Donald Trump has promised not to even try for a ceasefire isn’t on your hands, because you didn’t vote for Kamala Harris.

I hope you’re fucking happy.

another 100% truthful post from return2ozma

all i know is that you wrote almost 1500 words about why voting is pointless and then did not provide any alternatives

you advocated for voting in local elections, but not before saying that voting in local elections is pointless because local politicians can be easily bribed. you advocated for joining unions, but not before saying one should be wary of doing so because unions can be captured by the institution, however that’s supposed to happen.

all there is in that thread is 1500 words of doomerism. fuck doomerism, ima vote.

by the way, stop putting your own words on a pedestal just because you wrote them when you were slightly less sleep deprived. i’ve tried it before. it rarely works out well.

obligatory PLASMA RULES GNOME DROOLS

Not really.

The defining characteristic of the furry fandom is a fascination with anthropomorphic (= walks on two legs and can talk) animals, whether in a sexual context or not. The sexual side of the fandom is the side that gets the most attention (and, admittedly, it is pretty big), but it is by no means the only side. The appeal is in creating a character that represents you to the wider world without revealing anything about your real life identity beyond your aesthetic choices, and along with it a persona that you can adopt for a while that has none of the responsibilities of being a human and a cool animal tail to boot. Dogs don’t have jobs. They don’t worry about bills. They just run around and play and be dumb and boop each other’s noses. And sometimes, after a long day as a software engineer, vaccine researcher, or brain surgeon, that’s exactly what you need.

With regard to the sexual side, every individual furry has different places where they draw the line with regard to resemblance to actual animals. Some stay away from sexualizing anthropomorphic characters altogether, most draw the line when a creature stops walking on two legs, some are okay with characters that look like actual wolves and cheetahs as long as they talk and think like humans, a few only draw the line when it stops being fictional, but the one thing they all have in common is a strong condemnation for actual, real-life bestiality. Zoophilia is not tolerated, anywhere. Most furries view it as morally equivalent to pedophilia.

(from Tom Fischbach, creator of Twokinds)

what message am i supposed to take away from this?

other than that OP takes an offensively bleak view of what life in africa is like?

so like the autopilot in Elite Dangerous. will it get you there? sure. will it get you there fast? …not exactly.

what communities are those?

Yeah I really got that impression from your comment framing Trump’s stances on various wars as reasonable compared to Harris’s

We’re on the internet, bro. You have a search engine right fucking there. I didn’t know what vatnik meant either until I googled it 20 seconds ago. What is your excuse?

and I’m not actually sure if he even means what he says.

don’t you think it says something that this is the only excuse people who defend trump can come up with anymore