• 72 Posts
  • 259 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 22nd, 2023

help-circle
  • 2pt_perversion@lemmy.worldtoGaming@lemmy.worldGamer_IRL
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    It’s at the point where it requires enough equipment and skill that I’d recommend just going to a shop for newcomers. But it’s easy enough that you don’t need really need an expensive microscope or rework station so for people who already have some experience under their belt it’s doable as long as they practice on junk boards down to 0201 sized components.



  • 2pt_perversion@lemmy.worldtoGaming@lemmy.worldGamer_IRL
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    V1 switch just needs a jig, simple. V2 switch picofly is affordable and accessible to diy with some soldering skills. With the OLED models they put one of the points underneath a BGA chip making that more difficult.

    But getting one installed from an actual shop will still only cost the price of a Nintendo game or two.


  • The fact that you have to say “in a sense” alludes to it being clickbait. In a sense every NDA ever has some sort of value attached to it. It would also be $15k difference in Trump’s legal team offers and after negotiations were final a $7.5k actual difference. Compared to the 600k already owed hardly a move of the needle. It’s really just standard lawyer negotiations.

    The title makes one think Trump did the same thing he did the first time again which is not the case


  • Damn clickbaity headlines. It’s not like he offered her more money to shut up. Stormy Daniels was ordered to pay Trump’s legal fees due to a failed defamation suit and Trump’s lawyers tried to get an NDA in addition to the amount that Stormy’s legal team offered. The headline makes it sound like he was randomly offering her money just to shut up which is not the case. When we promote these sort of headlines it just gives the MAGA cult stuff to point at as to why all news is “fake news” and nothing should be trusted.







  • A company “accusing” someone of piracy isn’t proof. Access to the internet is almost essential these days. If you can prove a person is pirating prosecute them under the law with fines or even incarceration if warranted. But stripping internet access from someone shouldn’t be seen as an acceptable punishment for a free citizen anyway.

    Whoever owns the network attached to the IP address also shouldn’t be responsible for actions of every user. Let’s ban an entire company, college, or government institution from the internet because an IP showed up on a list… dumb ruling.